Do we live in an open universe

  • Thread starter wolram
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Universe
In summary, this paper seems to say so http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.1183.pdf, so does this mean heat death or the big rip is assured end of the universe?
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
This paper seems to say so http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.1183.pdf, so does this mean heat death or the big rip is assured end of the universe?

Edit.
From Wiki.
If Ω < 1, the geometry of space is open, i.e., negatively curved like the surface of a saddle. The angles of a triangle sum to less than 180 degrees, and lines that do not meet are never equidistant; they have a point of least distance and otherwise grow apart. The geometry of such a universe is hyperbolic.
Even without dark energy, a negatively curved universe expands forever, with gravity barely slowing the rate of expansion. With dark energy, the expansion not only continues but accelerates. The ultimate fate of an open universe is either universal heat death, the "Big Freeze", or the "Big Rip", where the acceleration caused by dark energy eventually becomes so strong that it completely overwhelms the effects of the gravitational, electromagnetic and strong binding forces
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
The practical differences between the big rip and the big freeze are negligible and they are both very bad, so I'm planning on being elsewhere when it happens.
 
  • #3
wolram said:
This paper seems to say so http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.1183.pdf, so does this mean heat death or the big rip is assured end of the universe?
Let me just say that I am immediately skeptical of anything coming from somebody who won the Templeton Prize...

More on topic, though, as long as the dark energy continues to act like a cosmological constant (which seems most likely), whether the universe is slightly open or slightly closed is irrelevant to the future fate of the universe, as it will be driven asymptotically towards flatness.
 
  • #4
phinds said:
The practical differences between the big rip and the big freeze are negligible and they are both very bad, so I'm planning on being elsewhere when it happens.

I think the difference is pretty big. Big rip is essentially a singularity while big freeze is just nothing happening.
 
  • #5
chill_factor said:
I think the difference is pretty big. Big rip is essentially a singularity while big freeze is just nothing happening.

Again, in PRACTICAL terms, there is no difference (to a human). Dead is dead.
 
  • #6
phinds said:
Again, in PRACTICAL terms, there is no difference (to a human). Dead is dead.
Well, in practical terms it's irrelevant because neither will happen before we all die anyway.
 
  • #7
Chalnoth said:
Well, in practical terms it's irrelevant because neither will happen before we all die anyway.

Gosh, do you think maybe that was my POINT? Do any of your friends ever ask you if you have a sense of humor?
 
  • #8
phinds said:
Gosh, do you think maybe that was my POINT? Do any of your friends ever ask you if you have a sense of humor?
The way you said it (in both posts) made it sound rather like you were saying that heat death/big rip would cause our deaths, but it wouldn't matter because either way we'd be dead.
 
  • #9
Chalnoth said:
The way you said it (in both posts) made it sound rather like you were saying that heat death/big rip would cause our deaths, but it wouldn't matter because either way we'd be dead.

Yes, that is EXACTLY what I was saying. I can see that my attempt at humor was a flop.

How could you possibly interprete "I plan on being elsewhere" as anything but humor? Do you really think I believe that either event will happen in our lifetime?
 
  • #10
phinds said:
Yes, that is EXACTLY what I was saying. I can see that my attempt at humor was a flop.

How could you possibly interprete "I plan on being elsewhere" as anything but humor? Do you really think I believe that either event will happen in our lifetime?
Sarcasm/facetiousness very frequently doesn't come across well in writing.
 
  • #11
Chalnoth said:
Sarcasm/facetiousness very frequently doesn't come across well in writing.

Yeah, I though it would in this case, but you're right that it often doesn't.
 
  • #12
wolram said:
This paper seems to say so http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.1183.pdf, so does this mean heat death or the big rip is assured end of the universe?

Edit.
From Wiki.
If Ω < 1, the geometry of space is open, i.e., negatively curved like the surface of a saddle. The angles of a triangle sum to less than 180 degrees, and lines that do not meet are never equidistant; they have a point of least distance and otherwise grow apart. The geometry of such a universe is hyperbolic.
Even without dark energy, a negatively curved universe expands forever, with gravity barely slowing the rate of expansion. With dark energy, the expansion not only continues but accelerates. The ultimate fate of an open universe is either universal heat death, the "Big Freeze", or the "Big Rip", where the acceleration caused by dark energy eventually becomes so strong that it completely overwhelms the effects of the gravitational, electromagnetic and strong binding forces

If you continue by letting your unconscious answer that, can you notice, “How do you know the difference?”
 
  • #13
wilsonb said:
If you continue by letting your unconscious answer that, can you notice, “How do you know the difference?”
Well, according to the OP link, by the existence of significant magnetic fields in the universe today, that require primordial seeding.
Magnetic fields evolve very differently in open and closed Friedmann models. The existence of significant magnetic fields in the universe today, that require primordial seeding, may therefore provide strong evidence that the universe is marginally open rather than marginally closed.

This isn't about the the 'Big Rip', or any other imaginative conjecture, but about a 'local' observation that seems to test whether the universe is open or not.

Garth
 
Last edited:
  • #14
chill_factor said:
I think the difference is pretty big. Big rip is essentially a singularity while big freeze is just nothing happening.

How is the big rip a singularity? What exactly becomes singular?
 
  • #15
Flatland said:
How is the big rip a singularity? What exactly becomes singular?
The expansion becomes infinite in rate in a finite amount of time.
 
  • #16
I share your doubts, Chalnoth, nothing can increase from finite to infinitely large in a finite amount of time. Of course, logic forces me to concede nothing can go from finite to infinitely small in a finite amount of time.
 
  • #17
Chronos said:
I share your doubts, Chalnoth, nothing can increase from finite to infinitely large in a finite amount of time. Of course, logic forces me to concede nothing can go from finite to infinitely small in a finite amount of time.
Well, I think there are even bigger problems before we go that far. After all, we might simply conclude that the Big Rip ends at some finite time before the singularity. It's the difficulty in even getting that far that is a more relevant criticism.
 
  • #18
Chalnoth said:
The expansion becomes infinite in rate in a finite amount of time.

I'm still not sure what that has to do with a singularity. Is this different from a gravitational singularity?

Edit: I just did some reading and it appears that it's the observable universe that gets infinitesimal. Is that what's meant by "singularity?"
 
Last edited:
  • #19
Flatland said:
I'm still not sure what that has to do with a singularity. Is this different from a gravitational singularity?

Edit: I just did some reading and it appears that it's the observable universe that gets infinitesimal. Is that what's meant by "singularity?"
A singularity is a point of infinite density. The entire universe would have infinite density at the big rip.
 
  • #20
Chalnoth said:
A singularity is a point of infinite density. The entire universe would have infinite density at the big rip.

That seems very counter-intuitive. Wouldn't expansion cause the Universe to become less dense as it is doing now rather than more dense, much less infinitely dense? And how would the expansion rate become infinite? What does that even mean?
 
  • #21
Flatland said:
That seems very counter-intuitive. Wouldn't expansion cause the Universe to become less dense as it is doing now rather than more dense, much less infinitely dense? And how would the expansion rate become infinite? What does that even mean?
The mechanism behind the big rip is you have a form of energy which grows in energy density as the universe expands. As it grows in energy density, this causes the expansion to accelerate more rapidly, which causes this form of matter to grow in energy more rapidly, etc. So you have this nice feedback effect that, in essence, causes the universe to explode.

There are some pretty good reasons why this is generally considered impossible.
 

What is an open universe?

An open universe is a theoretical concept in cosmology where the expansion of the universe continues indefinitely, without ever slowing down or collapsing. This means that the universe will continue to expand forever.

How do we know if we live in an open universe?

Scientists use various methods, such as measuring the rate of expansion of the universe and studying the distribution of matter, to determine the type of universe we live in. Currently, the most widely accepted theory is that we live in a flat, open universe.

What are the implications of living in an open universe?

If we live in an open universe, it means that the universe will continue to expand forever and eventually all matter will become so spread out that the universe will become cold and dark. This is known as the "heat death" of the universe.

What evidence supports the idea of an open universe?

The observation of the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is the leftover radiation from the Big Bang, supports the idea of an open universe. The measurements of this radiation show that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate, indicating an open universe.

Could the idea of an open universe change in the future?

As with all scientific theories, the concept of an open universe could potentially change as new evidence and discoveries are made. However, currently, the evidence strongly supports the idea of an open universe and it is widely accepted in the scientific community.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • Cosmology
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top