Does energy storage in liquid air technology pass the laugh test?

  • Thread starter cave_cat
  • Start date
  • #1
41
0
a UK company got $10M to build it, see here http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/liquid-air-for-utility-scale-energy-storage/ . Can this be at least hypothetically feasible or is it more like pure quackery for stupid investors?

ETA: to clarify, I don't doubt that it would "work" the same way as thermoelectric generator "works". The question is about the reasonableness of this kind of thermal machine as an efficient energy storage. Are air liquefaction machines sufficiently efficient nowadays that you can lose some energy on liquefaction, then lose some more energy on the limitations of the heat engine and still output big enough percentage of energy input to make it a meaningful grid storage technology?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
466
2
All large energy storage systems are expensive. This one may be competitive, especially if they team up with one of the companies currently developing very efficient high volume high pressure compressors for carbon sequestration. They could combine this with any number of co-gen applications. This liquid nitrogen might even be made largely as a byproduct of another highly profitable commodity.
 
  • #3
137
0
This air liquification should be most efficient in cold climate areas with their cold and dry air, by which heat rejected can be utilized for other needs.
 

Related Threads on Does energy storage in liquid air technology pass the laugh test?

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
935
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
G
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
607
Replies
5
Views
785
Top