offtheleft
- 130
- 1
funny little topic a friend and i were on. i think it does.
Yes. Light does have mass. But we need to qualify that by providing the definition of mass as I have just used it. The term mass (as used here) is defined as the m in p = mv. When defined as such this mass is more precisley know as inertial mass. There is another definition which is also used quite a lot. If you have a point particle and you measure the inertial energy to be E and the magnitude of the momentum to be p then the quantity m0 in the expressionofftheleft said:funny little topic a friend and i were on. i think it does.
offtheleft said:funny little topic a friend and i were on. i think it does.
The FAQ asserts that the relativistic mass is defined as m = \gamma m_0 whereas relativistic mass is defined as the m in p = mv. This is an important difference.ZapperZ said:Please read the FAQ thread in the General Physics forum.
Zz.
An interesting thing is that a beam of light has no mass (I'm only referring to "proper" or "invariant" mass, which is what is usually called simply "mass"), while light propagating simultaneously and isotropically in all directions DOES have mass!offtheleft said:funny little topic a friend and i were on. i think it does.
GRB 080319B said:Search 'does light/photons have mass' on this website and you should find the answer in one of the multitude of threads on this question. Or you can go to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#Physical_properties".