Does the uncertainty principle mean that black hole has to become a big bang?

[TCS]

If we've perfectly located all of that mass, doesn't its momentum have to be infinetly or maximally dispersed. It would be a slow motion big bang from our frame because of space and time contraction and we couldn't even see it, but it seems like the mass should disperse in some diffraction pattern.

 

[mathman]

If we've perfectly located all of that mass, doesn't its momentum have to be infinetly or maximally dispersed. It would be a slow motion big bang from our frame because of space and time contraction and we couldn't even see it, but it seems like the mass should disperse in some diffraction pattern.

Current theory about what is going on inside a black hole is very fuzzy. The idea that all the mass is at one point is a prediction of general relativity, but it contradicts quantum theory. The two theories have not been reconciled for black holes.

 

[TCS]

Current theory about what is going on inside a black hole is very fuzzy. The idea that all the mass is at one point is a prediction of general relativity, but it contradicts quantum theory. The two theories have not been reconciled for black holes.

It makes me wonder if energy is distributed in the universe in a diffraction pattern.

 

[nkt]

Is the singularity principle still accepted?

If so, why is it so accepted? What if you have a super massive black hole that swallows 1 whole galaxy, where would the mass transfer? Wouldn't the singularity principle break down at a finite point?

I prefer the dispersion principle.

 

[sardar]

I cannot definitively say whether or not the uncertainty principle means that a black hole has to become a big bang. The uncertainty principle is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics that states that certain pairs of physical properties, such as position and momentum, cannot be simultaneously known to arbitrary precision. In the case of a black hole, the uncertainty principle may play a role in determining the behavior of matter and energy within the black hole, but it is not the only factor at play.

Furthermore, the concept of a black hole becoming a big bang is not currently supported by scientific evidence. While it is true that a black hole has an immense amount of mass and its gravitational pull is incredibly strong, this does not necessarily mean that it will eventually explode into a big bang. There are other factors, such as the laws of thermodynamics, that also play a role in the behavior of black holes.

Additionally, the idea of the mass within a black hole becoming infinitely or maximally dispersed is not supported by current theories and observations. The behavior of matter and energy within a black hole is still not fully understood, and it is possible that the uncertainty principle may play a role in this behavior. However, it is unlikely that the mass would disperse in a diffraction pattern as you suggest.

In conclusion, while the uncertainty principle may have some influence on the behavior of matter and energy within a black hole, it is not the sole determining factor in whether or not a black hole becomes a big bang. The concept of a black hole becoming a big bang is not currently supported by scientific evidence, and the behavior of matter and energy within a black hole is still an area of ongoing research and study.