Doesn't calling the piont at 10 dimensions an infinity defeat the point of MTheory

[qpwimblik]

Isn't it so that for 10 dimensions in M Theory to be an actual infinity each of the 3D spatial aspects in each universe have to also be Infinity Large. Thus if each universe is Infinity large would it not contain all possible universes at all possible states in time of All possible universes with 3 spatial dimensions that is.

Wouldn't this kind of defeat the need to have 10 Dimensions to get to any possible place in the time of any 3 spatial dimensional universe as you could simply put your self in Cryostasis until you ended up anywhere at any state of time you wanted of 3 spatial dimensions.

If you think that the universe is like of the same physics all the way anywhere inside to cover why this might not be true then why Has NASA spotted differences in physics that are different at different sides of the visible Universe.

If your thinking of stating that the Multi-Verse is made up of finite sized universes then how is it at 10D infinite when all possibilities at all times can be thus accounted for with a number that occurs before Infinity.

I'm not saying M-theory might not hold true and I'm definitely not say it does hold true To me M-theory is like the new bubble (with the fact that a bubble is being said to be the universe a mystery to most people who would if they knew it ask what's outside the bubble) where at the top is a possible place for some bs god(maybe even a snotty nosed art student making the best of life in his Image). Any theory like that I hate with a passion but hey the question is why is the point in 10 dimensions expressing all possibilities of any given Universe of 3 spatial dimensions at any given time actually an infinity.

And now the Humdinger of a point what's to say in some diversion in the laws physics a universe can't skew into other spatial dimension above or below 3 thus rendering M theory obsolete.

I know there's 2 questions there.

 

[AndyW]

Hello,

Thank you for your interesting post. I understand your confusion and I would like to clarify some points about M-theory and the concept of infinite universes.

First of all, M-theory is a theoretical framework that attempts to unify all the different versions of string theory. It proposes that there are 11 dimensions, not 10 as you mentioned. These dimensions include the three dimensions of space that we are familiar with, as well as time. The other dimensions are thought to be compactified, meaning they are curled up and too small for us to perceive. It is important to note that M-theory is still a work in progress and there is no definitive proof for its existence.

Now, to address your question about infinite universes within M-theory. The concept of infinite universes is not a necessary consequence of M-theory. In fact, M-theory does not necessarily predict the existence of multiple universes. The idea of multiple universes comes from the concept of the multiverse, which is a different theoretical concept. The multiverse suggests that there are multiple universes, each with their own set of physical laws, and these universes may exist parallel to each other. However, this is still a highly debated and speculative concept in physics.

Additionally, the size of each universe is not necessarily infinite in M-theory. The size of a universe can vary depending on its physical laws and the amount of matter and energy within it. It is possible for a universe to be finite but still have 11 dimensions.

To address your point about NASA spotting differences in physics in different parts of the visible universe, this is due to the fact that the universe is constantly expanding and changing. As we look at different parts of the universe, we are essentially looking back in time. This means that we are seeing the universe at different stages of its evolution, which can result in differences in the physical laws that govern those areas.

Finally, your point about other dimensions skewing the laws of physics and rendering M-theory obsolete is a valid question. However, it is important to note that M-theory is still a developing theory and scientists are constantly exploring new ideas and possibilities. It is possible that future research may lead to the discovery of new dimensions or modifications to the existing theories.

In conclusion, M-theory is a complex and evolving theory that attempts to explain the fundamental nature of our universe. It does not necessarily predict the existence of infinite universes or a multiverse. The