Dot product of derivatives

  • Thread starter Nabeshin
  • Start date
  • #1
Nabeshin
Science Advisor
2,205
16
In reading a book on astrodynamics I came across the following statement:
[tex]\vec{a}\cdot \vec{\dot{a}}=a \dot{a}[/tex]

Where the dotting is the time derivative notation.

I put a picture of the original text up, and it's the statement right in the middle:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v715/deagleman9/IMG_1178.jpg
Except they use bold to indicate vectors.

Can anyone explain to me why this should be true? It seems akin to saying the angle between a vector and its time derivative is always 90, which is obviously not true. I've also considered it might be a notational problem with the unbolded quantities. At any rate, does anyone know what's going on here?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Nabeshin
Science Advisor
2,205
16
Never mind, I think I figured this one out. I think the right side is the time derivative of the magnitude of a, rather than the magnitude of the time derivative of a.
 

Related Threads on Dot product of derivatives

Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
494
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top