Double Channel Wing Plausible?

  • Thread starter roineust
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Channel
In summary, the conversation discusses a video and drawing related to a channel wing design and questions why it wouldn't improve upon the lifting force. The attached drawing from German Wikipedia suggests it could be an improvement, but the overall inefficiency of directing air horizontally over a wing is discussed, with the results in the video showing a much higher thrust than lift.
  • #1
roineust
338
9
Can anyone take a look at the following video, and then look at the attached drawing, and tell me: Why shouldn't the design described in the drawing, improve upon the channel wing lifting force?

Here is the video:



Here is the drawing:

Double Channel Wing 1.jpg
Double Channel Wing 1.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Double Channel Wing 1.jpg
    Double Channel Wing 1.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 531
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Mohankpvk
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #3
One way or another, the air has to be directed downward to produce lift. Blowing it horizontally over/across a wing is a really inefficient way to do that (sucking it over the wing is even worse)...as the results in the video show, with the thrust produced being about 5x the lift produced.
roineust said:
Can anyone take a look at the following video, and then look at the attached drawing, and tell me: Why shouldn't the design described in the drawing, improve upon the channel wing lifting force?
I'm sure it would -- but you should be able to predict how much of an improvement based on the results in the youtube video, and show yourself why it is still a really bad idea.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and roineust

What is a double channel wing plausible?

A double channel wing plausible is a design concept for an aircraft wing that utilizes two channels to control air flow and increase lift. The two channels are located on the upper and lower surfaces of the wing and are connected by small openings or channels on the leading edge. This design allows for greater control over the air flow and can result in improved aerodynamic performance.

How does a double channel wing plausible work?

The double channel wing plausible works by creating a pressure difference between the upper and lower channels, which results in an increased lift force. The upper channel is typically longer and narrower, while the lower channel is shorter and wider. This difference in dimensions creates a pressure gradient, with higher pressure on the lower surface and lower pressure on the upper surface, resulting in greater lift.

What are the advantages of a double channel wing plausible?

One of the main advantages of a double channel wing plausible is its ability to provide greater lift at lower speeds. This can be beneficial for takeoff and landing, as well as for operating in turbulent or low-speed conditions. Additionally, the design can also improve fuel efficiency and reduce drag, resulting in a more efficient and cost-effective aircraft.

What are the limitations of a double channel wing plausible?

One limitation of a double channel wing plausible is that it may be more complex and expensive to manufacture compared to traditional wing designs. Additionally, the effectiveness of the design may be limited in certain flight conditions, such as high speeds or extreme angles of attack. It may also require additional maintenance and inspection procedures.

Are double channel wing plausibles used in commercial aircraft?

While the concept of a double channel wing plausible has been studied and tested, it is not a commonly used design in commercial aircraft. However, it has been implemented in some military and experimental aircraft. As technology and research continue to advance, we may see more widespread use of this design in the future.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
775
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
909
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
107
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
377
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top