Correcting Data from Distant Sources for the Size of the Universe

In summary, the age of the universe is estimated using Hubble's Law, where the photons that are received were emitted from sources that are now further away. This means that the Hubble scale factor or Hubble Radius at the time the photon was emitted is not the same as it is now. Closeby galaxies are not much further away because their light has not been traveling as long as the light from more distant sources. However, the data from distant sources is not corrected to reflect the current size of the universe, resulting in a likely non-linear distribution of galaxies with a higher density at greater distances.
  • #1
yogi
1,525
10
When the age of the universe is estimated via Hubble's Law (v = Hr), the photons that are received were emitted from sources that are now further away - so in the limit of the theory, H = c/R where R is the Hubble scale factor or Hubble Radius at the time the photon was emitted. Closeby galaxies are not much further away now because light from them has not been traveling nearly as long as the light presently being received from the more distant sources - query - are the data from distant sources corrected to reflect the current size of the universe? This effect would appear to cause a non-linear distribution of galaxies (higher galactic density at greater distances).
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, the data from distant sources is not corrected to reflect the current size of the universe. As you pointed out, closeby galaxies are not much further away now because light from them has not been traveling nearly as long as the light presently being received from the more distant sources. This means that the Hubble scale factor or Hubble Radius at the time the photon was emitted is not the same as the Hubble scale factor or Hubble Radius now. Therefore, the distribution of galaxies is likely non-linear with a higher galactic density at greater distances.
 

1. How do scientists correct for the size of the universe when collecting data from distant sources?

Scientists use a variety of methods to correct for the size of the universe when collecting data from distant sources. One common method is to use standard candles, which are objects with a known brightness. By comparing the apparent brightness of the standard candles to their known brightness, scientists can calculate the distance to the source and correct for the size of the universe.

2. Why is it important to correct for the size of the universe when analyzing data from distant sources?

Correcting for the size of the universe is important because the farther away an object is, the more its light becomes stretched and distorted due to the expansion of the universe. This can cause objects to appear dimmer and smaller than they actually are, which can lead to incorrect conclusions about their properties and distances.

3. What are some other methods besides standard candles that scientists use to correct for the size of the universe?

In addition to standard candles, scientists also use redshift measurements and the cosmic distance ladder to correct for the size of the universe when analyzing data from distant sources. Redshift measures the amount that the light from an object is stretched due to the expansion of the universe, while the cosmic distance ladder uses a series of different distance indicators to calculate the distance to an object.

4. How accurate are the corrections for the size of the universe when analyzing data from distant sources?

The accuracy of the corrections for the size of the universe depends on the method used and the quality of the data. In general, these corrections are very accurate, with errors of only a few percent. However, there can be larger errors for very distant sources or when using less precise methods.

5. Can scientists ever be certain that their corrections for the size of the universe are completely accurate?

While scientists can be confident in the accuracy of their corrections for the size of the universe, it is important to note that there is always a margin of error in any scientific measurement. New techniques and technologies are constantly being developed to improve the accuracy of these corrections, but it is unlikely that we will ever have a completely perfect understanding of the size of the universe.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
552
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
809
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
543
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
914
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
14
Views
343
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top