Double pendulum

  • Thread starter zell99
  • Start date
  • #1
13
0

Homework Statement


A double pendulum consists of light, inextensible strings, AB and BC each of length l. It is fixed at one end A and carries two particles, each of mass m, which hang under gravity. The pendulum is constrained to move in a vertical plane. The angle between the vertical and AB is [itex]\theta[/itex], which the angle between BC and the vertical is [itex]\phi[/itex]. Show for smll angles about the equilibirium position:
[itex]d^2\theta/dt^2 +g/l(2\theta -\phi)=0[/itex]
[itex]d^2\phi/dt^2 +2g/l(\phi - \theta)=0 [/itex]

Homework Equations


Newton's second law.
I shouldn't need to use Langrangian mechanics.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've managed to derive the first equation, first by assuming the tension in BC is mg (small angle approximation) then resolving forces about the top mass, and using the small angle approximation for sin. But I just can't get the second result out. I've tried to do the same this (resolving forces) but I must be making a mistake somewhere. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,357
0
Strange. I get the following for the force in the tangential direction of the mass at the end of BC:

[tex]ma = m \frac{dv}{dt} = m l \, \frac{d^2 \phi}{dt^2} = mg \sin \phi \approx mg \phi[/tex]

Rearranging gives me:

[tex]\frac{d^2 \phi}{dt^2} - \frac{g}{l} \, \phi = 0[/tex]

This does not look like what you want to show. Hmm...
 
Last edited:
  • #3
13
0
Thnaks for the reply. I think what you're missing, and what I can't get the right value for, is that now the tension is no longer perpendicular to the gravitational force, due to the combination of strings, for the bottom mass. This will lead to an extra term but I can't get it to come out correctly.
If anyone knows I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks
 
  • #4
1,357
0
Thnaks for the reply. I think what you're missing, and what I can't get the right value for, is that now the tension is no longer perpendicular to the gravitational force, due to the combination of strings, for the bottom mass. This will lead to an extra term but I can't get it to come out correctly.
Who said the tension is perpendicular to the graviational force? The tension is always parallel to the string.
 
  • #5
13
0
Sorry my fault, should have been more accurate with words, (I don't think what I meant was right either). I'm still confused so if someone is able to derive or give me a hint towards the second equation I'd be really grateful.
Thanks
 
  • #6
13
0
Anyone? please.
 
  • #7
J77
1,076
1
It's hard to say where you've made the mistake.

There's obviously more work involved using Newton's equations than Lagrange's -- therefore, you may have to post all your working for help...

(At soem point, you should have 4 equations for [tex]\ddot\theta, \dot\theta^2, \ddot\phi, \dot\phi^2[/tex] from which the tensions in terms of [tex]\ddot\theta, \ddot\phi, \theta, \phi[/tex] can be found...)
 
  • #8
13
0
Thanks for the reply. I gave up in the end and used the Langrange.
 

Related Threads on Double pendulum

  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
380
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
16K
Top