1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Double pendulum

  1. Mar 21, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A double pendulum consists of light, inextensible strings, AB and BC each of length l. It is fixed at one end A and carries two particles, each of mass m, which hang under gravity. The pendulum is constrained to move in a vertical plane. The angle between the vertical and AB is [itex]\theta[/itex], which the angle between BC and the vertical is [itex]\phi[/itex]. Show for smll angles about the equilibirium position:
    [itex]d^2\theta/dt^2 +g/l(2\theta -\phi)=0[/itex]
    [itex]d^2\phi/dt^2 +2g/l(\phi - \theta)=0 [/itex]

    2. Relevant equations
    Newton's second law.
    I shouldn't need to use Langrangian mechanics.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I've managed to derive the first equation, first by assuming the tension in BC is mg (small angle approximation) then resolving forces about the top mass, and using the small angle approximation for sin. But I just can't get the second result out. I've tried to do the same this (resolving forces) but I must be making a mistake somewhere. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 21, 2007 #2
    Strange. I get the following for the force in the tangential direction of the mass at the end of BC:

    [tex]ma = m \frac{dv}{dt} = m l \, \frac{d^2 \phi}{dt^2} = mg \sin \phi \approx mg \phi[/tex]

    Rearranging gives me:

    [tex]\frac{d^2 \phi}{dt^2} - \frac{g}{l} \, \phi = 0[/tex]

    This does not look like what you want to show. Hmm...
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2007
  4. Mar 22, 2007 #3
    Thnaks for the reply. I think what you're missing, and what I can't get the right value for, is that now the tension is no longer perpendicular to the gravitational force, due to the combination of strings, for the bottom mass. This will lead to an extra term but I can't get it to come out correctly.
    If anyone knows I'd really appreciate it.
  5. Mar 22, 2007 #4
    Who said the tension is perpendicular to the graviational force? The tension is always parallel to the string.
  6. Mar 22, 2007 #5
    Sorry my fault, should have been more accurate with words, (I don't think what I meant was right either). I'm still confused so if someone is able to derive or give me a hint towards the second equation I'd be really grateful.
  7. Mar 23, 2007 #6
    Anyone? please.
  8. Mar 23, 2007 #7


    User Avatar

    It's hard to say where you've made the mistake.

    There's obviously more work involved using Newton's equations than Lagrange's -- therefore, you may have to post all your working for help...

    (At soem point, you should have 4 equations for [tex]\ddot\theta, \dot\theta^2, \ddot\phi, \dot\phi^2[/tex] from which the tensions in terms of [tex]\ddot\theta, \ddot\phi, \theta, \phi[/tex] can be found...)
  9. Mar 23, 2007 #8
    Thanks for the reply. I gave up in the end and used the Langrange.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?