(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); HELLO. GOT A QUICK QUESTION:

FROM THE TEXT:

[tex]|S_{mn} - S| <\ \in\ for\ all\ m,n \ge N.[/tex]

[tex]For\ the\ moment,\ consider\ m\ \in\ N\ to\ be\ fixed\ and\ write\ S_{mn}\ as:[/tex]

[tex]S_{mn}\ =\ \sum^{n}_{j=1}a_{1j}\ +\ \sum^{n}_{j=1}a_{2j}\ +\ ...\ +\ \sum^{n}_{j=1}a_{mj}[/tex]

[tex]Our\ hypothesis\ guarantees\ that\ for\ each\ fixed\ row,\ i,\ the\ series\ \sum^{\infty}_{j=1}\ converges\ absoloutely\ to\ some\ real\ number,\ r_i.[/tex]

HERES WHAT I HAVE TO DO:

[tex]Exercise\ 2.8.5.\ (a)\ Use\ the\ Algebraic\ Limit\ Theorem\ and\ the\ Order\ limit\ theorem\ to\ show\ that\ for\ all\ m\ge N\ |(r_{1},\ +\ r_{2},\ +\ ...\ +\ r_{m})\ -\ S| \le \in[/tex]

[tex]Conclude\ that\ the\ iterated\ sum\ \sum^{\infty}_{i=1}\sum^{\infty}_{j=1}\ converges\ to\ S[/tex]

Obviously the larger of an m you take r_m to means the closer you'll get to S, and since m belongs to N then the largest it can go is infinity, which would mean the double sum would indeed converge to S. Is that "enough" of a conclusion?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Doubly Indexed Array

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Doubly Indexed Array | Date |
---|---|

I Del in index notation | Sep 1, 2016 |

Tensor/Index notation | Jul 14, 2015 |

Struggling with basic index notation | Nov 7, 2013 |

Notation for partial derivatives using indexes | Jul 13, 2013 |

Optimal Tilt Angle of Solar Array | Jul 21, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**