1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Doubt in Thermal Expansion.

  1. Dec 10, 2012 #1
    Consider a rod of length 'l'. When heated, its temperature got increased by 't'.
    Increase in its length = l[itex]\alpha[/itex]t.
    total length be (l1) = l + l[itex]\alpha[/itex]t.
    Again the rod is heated and the temperature further got increased by 't'.
    Total length be l2.
    l2 can be calculated in two ways,
    l2 = l1 + l1[itex]\alpha[/itex] t......(a)
    0r l2 = l + l[itex]\alpha[/itex](2t)........(b)
    Equating (a) and (b).
    l1 + l1[itex]\alpha[/itex] t = l+l[itex]\alpha[/itex](2t)
    {l + l[itex]\alpha[/itex]t} + {l + l[itex]\alpha[/itex]t}{[itex]\alpha[/itex] t}
    = l+l[itex]\alpha[/itex](2t).
    Solving above equation we get l([itex]\alpha[/itex]t)2 = 0.
    Where am i going wrong?
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2012
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 10, 2012 #2
    Your equation b is wrong.
  4. Dec 10, 2012 #3
    What is wrong?
    Initial length of rod is 'l' and total rise in temperature is '2t'.
    l2 = l + l[itex]\alpha[/itex](2t).

    Its perfect.
  5. Dec 11, 2012 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The coefficient of expansion varies with temperature. For most substances and practical temperature ranges the variation is small, as is the quadratic term in your calculations.
  6. Dec 11, 2012 #5
    Since, [itex]\alpha[/itex] is small,[itex]\alpha[/itex]2 can be neglected and can be considered zero.
  7. Dec 11, 2012 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The formula l1 = l + l[itex]\alpha[/itex]t works only for very small t. Correct way to look after sweep over finite temperature range would be as follows.

    [tex]l+dl = l + l \alpha dt[/tex]

    Where dl is a small change in length, and dt is a small change in temperature. You can rearrange that into a differential equation.

    [tex]dl/dt = l \alpha[/tex]

    And that's easily solved.

    [tex]l_1 = l_0 e^{\alpha t}[/tex]

    Now if you substitute this into your formula, it works either way.

    [tex]l_2 = l_1 e^{\alpha t} = l_0 e^{\alpha t + \alpha t} = l_0 e^{\alpha 2t}[/tex]
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Doubt Thermal Expansion Date
B A Doubt about Ampere's law Jan 15, 2018
B Forces-General Doubts Dec 4, 2017
B Simple doubt in nuclear fission Sep 20, 2017
Thermal condution? little confusing can u please help to remove my doubt. Jan 1, 2012