1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Drag and time to slow down -__-

  1. Oct 26, 2004 #1
    drag and time to slow down... and apparent weight. -__-

    A 1.58 m wide, 1.44 m high, 1300 kg car hits a very slick patch of ice while going 20.0 m/s. Air resistance is not negligible.

    If friction is neglected, how long will it take until the car's speed drops to 18.0 m/s?

    Ok drag is equal to = 1/4 * A * v^2

    v^2 = 400 and A = 1.44*1.58

    I divided this drag by the mass to get acceleration in the x direction and then used this equation:

    [tex]v_f = v_i + a t[/tex]

    t here is delta t...

    final velocity is what I want = 18 and initial is 20 while acceleration is the one I got from analyzing the drag force....

    I get 11.4 seconds and it's wrong. :cry:

    I did it again and again to make sure there are no errors but nothing changed.


    btw does anybody know how to get the mass from a chart of apparent weight vs time? I know it's w/g but I only have apparent weight and not weight... I can't tell when it's equal to the real weight. (when a = 0 but I can't tell from the chart).

    Here's the chart:

    Last edited: Oct 26, 2004
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 26, 2004 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The rate of deceleration is not constant as you assumed. Also, where did the factor of 1/4 come from?
  4. Oct 26, 2004 #3
    (1/4 * A * v^2 ) <--- equation in my text for drag...

    and if deacceleration is not constant... how can I calculate the time?
  5. Oct 26, 2004 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    You'll have to integrate

    [tex]\frac {dv}{dt} = - \frac {A}{4M} v^2[/tex]
  6. Oct 26, 2004 #5
    ok so integrating that would result in the same drag equation but [tex]v^2[/tex] becomes [tex]\frac {v^3}{3}[/tex] but since acceleration is not constant I can't use the kinematic equations to solve for delta t...


    now that I think about it I'm supposed to get an equation for velocity in t right? after getting that equation I'll just plug the velocity 18 to get t... :confused:


    ok integrating the derivative of velocity (which is acceleration) gives me the original equation for velocity right? I just plugged in 18 in that equation I integrated and the time is still wrong... :(
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2004
  7. Oct 26, 2004 #6
    you integration is wrong; try to rearrange the equation tide gave you so that v terms is together with dv and dt is at the other side of the equation.
  8. Oct 26, 2004 #7
    I got several equations and all of them were wrong.. :cry:

    re-arranging that equation gives me this.. right?

    [tex]v = \frac {-4 m}{A t}[/tex]

    do I need to integrate that?

    [edit]integrate the the t?

    this sucks. Our course is supposed to be calculus-based but out of 10 HW problems only 1 has to do with calculus... and of course the text barely goes over problems that need calculus. And yes I'm trying to save (a little) face. :(
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2004
  9. Oct 26, 2004 #8
    [tex]\int_{20}^{v} -\frac{4m}{Av^2} dv = \int_{0}^{t} dt[/tex]
    Know how to integrate this ?
  10. Oct 26, 2004 #9
    no. :(

    Is there any other way to solve the problem? the course I'm taking uses VERY easy and simple calculus in the rare occasions it's needed.... so there must be another way. =\
  11. Oct 26, 2004 #10
    there is other way of course but it is more complicated . something like alternative to integration, numerical methods. ok, i will integrate for you . tide must not be very happy with this.
  12. Oct 26, 2004 #11
    the time I get is still wrong...

    bah forget about it and thanks a lot man. I'll ask my teacher next week. The guy hates me but I hope not enough to refuse. :biggrin:
  13. Oct 26, 2004 #12
    is it 12.7 s?
  14. Oct 26, 2004 #13
    I got 13.7....

    *types in 12.7*

    it's correct.


    [edit] my mistake was rounding/significant figures. and yes I'm not dead. >_<
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2004
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook