Drake's Equation: Do Other Life Forms Exist?

  • Thread starter wolram
  • Start date
In summary: is correct without any evidence.Hi phinds, after giving some thought to his original post, I think it's more logical to say we honestly have absolutely no idea, rather than assuming one side or the other is correct without any evidence.
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
Why do people believe that life on other planets exist along side our own at the right time for us to find?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why do people believe that life doesn't exist on other planets along side our own at the right time for us to find?

There really isn't strong evidence one way or the other yet :)
 
  • #3
Because if even 99.99% of civilizations destroy themselves or simply die out, .01% of them, building up in the few billion years that complex life could have exists is a still a non-negligible number.
 
  • #4
Considering the vastness of the cosmos, it isn't too much of an assumption that the conditions which led to life on Earth could arise elsewhere.
Intelligent life within a reasonable communicating distance from Earth (Say 20 ly?) is way more speculative, but the fact is we only have one example of any kind of life so far, which is Earth of course.
Until we find at least one other everything in the Drake equation is just guessing really.
(Number of systems harbouring rocky planets seems to be looking good lately though)
 
  • #5
Best question for Dr. Drake: "Why would they care about us?"
 
  • #6
wolram said:
Why do people believe that life on other planets exist along side our own at the right time for us to find?
Why should they NOT believe it?
 
  • #7
phinds said:
Why should they NOT believe it?
There's no real reason either way, we don't have the information make an informed guess.
 
  • #8
Noisy Rhysling said:
There's no real reason either way, we don't have the information make an informed guess.
Yes, *I* understand that. I was addressing the OP's question and trying to get HIM to think about that.
 
  • #9
phinds said:
Yes, *I* understand that. I was addressing the OP's question and trying to get HIM to think about that.
Didn't say you were doing anything else.
 
  • #10
Noisy Rhysling said:
Didn't say you were doing anything else.

Didn't say you said he said he didn't say.
 
  • #11
Gesundheit.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #12
Isn't Drake's initial prediction for extraterrestrial life in our galaxy, let alone modern predictions, enough to assume that life does exist somewhere in our galaxy other than earth?
 
  • #13
It's not really a predication, just a formula into which various parameters can be put.
Most of those parameters remain highly uncertain at the present time.
 
  • #14
rootone said:
It's not really a predication, just a formula into which various parameters can be put.
Most of those parameters remain highly uncertain at the present time.

Fair enough, but an answer seems more explicit if we do ever encounter another life form, considering that a larger and more thorough sample in a survey makes for better results, for the lack of a better analogy.
 
  • #15
Exactly. We really do need to discover another instance of life apart from that on Earth before any estimations are meaningful.
Even if it's only primitive slime mould or something similar.
 
  • #16
twiz_ said:
Isn't Drake's initial prediction for extraterrestrial life in our galaxy, let alone modern predictions, enough to assume that life does exist somewhere in our galaxy other than earth?
First we'd have to know if it was a valid conjecture. And then we'd have to have the numbers to plug into it. But Drake doesn't, IIRC, account for distance from Earth. If they're 10 billion light years away we may not hear from them.
 
  • #17
rootone said:
Exactly. We really do need to discover another instance of life apart from that on Earth before any estimations are meaningful.
Even if it's only primitive slime mould or something similar.
Good point. And if aliens had visited Earth at almost any time during the period when we had life here they wouldn't have found intelligent life. (At least not until the dolphins evolved.)
 
  • #18
rootone said:
Exactly. We really do need to discover another instance of life apart from that on Earth before any estimations are meaningful.
Even if it's only primitive slime mould or something similar.
Finding other life wouldn't fully help us with the Drake equation, it'd still leave one major variable that would have no information. What would be more interesting is finding the ruins of a dead civilization.
 
  • #19
phinds said:
Yes, *I* understand that. I was addressing the OP's question and trying to get HIM to think about that.

Hi phinds, after giving some thought to his i think it will be impossible for us to know, either the distance from us will be to far to communicate and very unlikely for intelligent life to exist at the same time as us.
 
  • #20
Far more likely to find TWO unicorns in your back yard.
 
  • #21
I think it's more logical to say we honestly have absolutely no idea, rather than assuming one side or the other
 

1. What is Drake's Equation?

Drake's Equation is a mathematical formula created by astronomer Frank Drake in 1961 to estimate the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy.

2. How does Drake's Equation work?

Drake's Equation takes into account factors such as the rate of star formation in our galaxy, the fraction of stars that have planets, the number of planets that could potentially support life, and the likelihood of life developing on those planets.

3. Is Drake's Equation considered to be accurate?

Drake's Equation is not considered to be a definitive answer on the existence of other life forms, but rather a way to estimate the probability of their existence based on our current scientific knowledge.

4. Has Drake's Equation been used to search for extraterrestrial life?

Yes, scientists have used Drake's Equation to guide their search for extraterrestrial life by focusing on planets and star systems that meet the criteria outlined in the equation.

5. What are the limitations of Drake's Equation?

One of the main limitations of Drake's Equation is that it relies on many unknown factors and assumptions, such as the frequency of intelligent life and the likelihood of communication between civilizations. Additionally, the equation only focuses on life forms that are similar to humans, and may not account for other forms of life that we are not yet aware of.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
765
Replies
61
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
399
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top