Can a Regular Polygon with 17 Sides be Constructed Using Only Compass and Ruler?

  • Thread starter Mafer
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Polygon
In summary, the conversation revolves around constructing a polygon with a specific number of sides using only a compass and unscaled ruler. It is mentioned that a 23-sided polygon is not constructible, while options for constructible polygons are listed. The conversation also delves into the history of polygon construction, mentioning the work of Gauss and Conway. The speaker also shares their own approach to constructing a 23-sided polygon and asks for feedback on their method. They also mention difficulties with language barriers and ask for assistance in improving their English in math and science.
  • #1
Mafer
15
0
I want to draw a polygon with 17 sides by using only the compasses and an unscaled ruler...however, many times i tried, I just managed to draw a polygon with 23 sides...any site?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Are you sure you end up with a 23 sides regular polygon? Because I was under the impression that 23 sides wasn't possible. Certainly it's not listed here.
 
  • #3
23 sided polygon is not constructible. An n-sided reguar polygon is constructible if and only if n is the product of distinct fermat primes (primes of the form 2^(2^m)+1) and some power of 2. Known options for fermat primes are currently only 3, 5, 17, 257, and 65537.


I haven't checked if this works for a 17-sided construction, but I'm inclined to trust in Conway:

http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=1078422&tstart=0
 
  • #4
I'm sure it's a 23 sided...because I drew the things about twenty times and all end up with 23 and not 17...
anyone can tell me what's wrong? Is there something I might forgotten?
 
  • #5
Mafer said:
I'm sure it's a 23 sided...because I drew the things about twenty times and all end up with 23 and not 17...
anyone can tell me what's wrong? Is there something I might forgotten?
Maybe it would be good that you show us your steps, and we may verify it for you. :)
Ther may be something wrong in your approach.
 
  • #6
I drew a cirlcle and a horizontal line,AB,through the centre...and i made a straight line, Z, 90 degress from the AB...and divide the line(the ones on above the horizontal line) into 4, marked the 1/4 as C. from C I draw a line towards A and from there, I divide the degrees between Z and AC into 2where, I marked D. and from there, I divide it one more times, and marked and E. from C, I draw another point F which have the same distance as CD. then, I divide AF into 2. the centre is drawn a line straight up(90 degress), and marked the point that cross the circle, G. using compasses, I measure from A to G. With the same distance, I draw another point from G...and another...and another...but arround the third circle to mark, I stop and there are many empty and unmarked. Using the two dots besides, i divide them into two and marked a point. When all points are made, there...23 sides!
If you do not understand what I mean, please tell me...that's because here, in my year, I don't learn MAths in English, and the government had only changed the education policy years before for those in first year...so I am the last secong batch who study Maths and Science in non-English...please forgive me, and it's a pleasure if you want to teach me how to improve my English in MAths and Science...because according to the new policy, my A-level(which is GCE or STPM, here, or matriculations) and education after this...all MAths and Science will be in English...:(
 
  • #7
shmoe: I haven't checked if this works for a 17-sided construction, but I'm inclined to trust in Conway.

It was Gauss who discovered the whole matter of construction beyond that of the Ancient Greeks. Discovering the constructability of the 17 sided regular polygon, he said this was the first progress on the problem in 2000 years. He made this discovery by 19, and was not even a decided "math major" at the time.

Constructability is defined as employing a straight edge and compass. From this we can do the four ordinary functions of arithmetic, and we can find SQUARE roots. We can not, as a general rule, find cube roots and thus trisect an angle. (However Archimedes was able to do this employing a paper strip.) The question then of constructability is thus very narrowly defined, but it allows us to translate a plane geometry construction into an algebraic equation. Thus, for example, we can determine

[tex]cos(36) =\frac{1+\sqrt5}{4}[/tex] which allows us to construct the 5 sided pentagon.

Gauss did publish in Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, where you can find it, the algebratic form of the side of the 17-sided Heptadecagon, but he did not carry this form to completion. It is complicated, and has little practical use.

The construction is partly shown: http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/8972/lessons/Heptadecagon.html
 
Last edited:
  • #8
then how did the same wat...could developed into a 23 sided polygon?
 
  • #9
You said you made a straight line, 90 degrees from AB? YOu did not say where it touched, if it did, AB. Maybe you could include a picture somehow, it's been done.
 

1. What is a polygon?

A polygon is a closed shape made up of straight line segments. It is a two-dimensional shape with three or more sides.

2. How many sides does a polygon with 17 sides have?

A polygon with 17 sides has 17 straight sides.

3. Can you draw a polygon with 17 sides?

Yes, it is possible to draw a polygon with 17 sides. However, it may be difficult to draw it accurately by hand without the use of tools such as a protractor or compass.

4. What is the name of a polygon with 17 sides?

A polygon with 17 sides is called a heptadecagon.

5. How do you draw a polygon with 17 sides?

To draw a polygon with 17 sides, you can use a protractor or compass to measure and mark the angles and sides accurately. Alternatively, you can use a computer software or app to create a precise and symmetrical polygon with 17 sides.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
841
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
499
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
891
Back
Top