Explore How Dropping Objects Into a Black Hole Changes It

In summary: The "reshaping" of the EH is not a causal process. The EH starts to move outward before any information about the infalling object could have reached it by any causal process. That's why you...
  • #1
DrStupid
2,167
502
Mentors' note: This thread has been split off from https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/can-you-even-fall-into-a-black-hole.992212/ because it's a different interesting question that deserves it's own thread
Grinkle said:
If there were a physics lab at the BH at the center of the Milky Way, say it was 1 LY distant from the EH of that black hole, or if some other distance makes the question more sensible, whatever distance that is, and a beacon is fired at the event horizon at 0.5 c relative to the physics lab, how much time would the clock on the physics lab measure before the beacon was observed to cross the EH?
Ibix said:
If you assume that the black hole is a purely classical black hole, like a Schwarzschild or Kerr black hole, then the answer is infinite time.

That applies to a static black hole. But if something falls in it isn't static anymore. Is the answer still infinite in this case?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
DrStupid said:
That applies to a static black hole. But if something falls in it isn't static anymore. Is the answer still infinite in this case?
Generally if you drop an object into a static Schwarzschild black hole, after a short period of complicated dynamic behavior it will settle down into a slightly more massive Schwarzschild black hole.
 
  • #3
Nugatory said:
Generally if you drop an object into a static Schwarzschild black hole, after a short period of complicated dynamic behavior it will settle down into a slightly more massive Schwarzschild black hole.

The question is: Would an external observe see the object freezing at the new event horizon or disappearing during the short period of complicated dynamic behavior? If the object gets closer to the original EH than its own Schwarzschild radius before the EH expands to its final size I would expect it to disappear. As the final approach to the EH is exponentially this would happen quite fast. In case of a BH with the mass of the Sun it would be less than a millisecond for the last km.
 
  • #4
DrStupid said:
Would an external observe see the object freezing at the new event horizon or disappearing during the short period of complicated dynamic behavior?

Freezing at the new event horizon. The event horizon is not a locally observable surface; its location depends on the entire future history of the hole and its exterior. So the event horizon, heuristically, already "knows" that the object is going to fall in before the object reaches it, and moves outward in response so that when the object reaches the new horizon radius, the horizon is already there.

DrStupid said:
If the object gets closer to the original EH than its own Schwarzschild radius

This is not possible; the EH moves outward in advance, as above.
 
  • Like
Likes DrStupid
  • #5
PeterDonis said:
So the event horizon, heuristically, already "knows" that the object is going to fall in before the object reaches it, and moves outward in response
Getting my head around this:

The EH is an abstract boundary wherein photons (and everything else) cannot escape). 7

As a massive object falls in, there is a volume above the (otherwise spherical) EH but below the infalling massive object from which photons have no path back to flat space. Thus, technically, that volume is now inside the EH, which is no longer spherical.

So, the EH is being reshaped (moved outward) to include that volume in flux by the spacetime curvature of the infalling mass.

Yes?
 
  • #6
PeterDonis said:
So the event horizon, heuristically, already "knows" that the object is going to fall in before the object reaches it

In the sense that a thermos "knows" to keep hot things hot and cold things cold.
 
  • #7
DaveC426913 said:
The EH is an abstract boundary wherein photons (and everything else) cannot escape).

Cannot escape to infinity (more precisely, future null infinity). But there is no way to know that locally. You have to know the entire 4-d spacetime geometry--in other words, the entire future of the hole and its exterior.

DaveC426913 said:
As a massive object falls in, there is a volume above the (otherwise spherical) EH but below the infalling massive object from which photons have no path back to flat space. Thus, technically, that volume is now inside the EH, which is no longer spherical.

As you can see, it's very difficult to describe what's going on in local language without tying yourself in knots. :wink:

This is basically correct if we interpret the on its face contradictory statements about the EH (that there is a volume "above the EH" which is also "inside the EH") appropriately (that there is a volume at a radial coordinate larger than that of the original radial coordinate of the EH which is nevertheless inside the EH).

DaveC426913 said:
the EH is being reshaped (moved outward) to include that volume in flux by the spacetime curvature of the infalling mass.

The "reshaping" of the EH is not a causal process. The EH starts to move outward before any information about the infalling object could have reached it by any causal process. That's why you can't really think of the EH locally. You have to think of it as a boundary that we draw after the fact, once we know the future history of the hole, to mark off the region of spacetime that, taking the entire future history into account, cannot send light signals to future null infinity.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913

1. How does dropping an object into a black hole change it?

When an object is dropped into a black hole, it undergoes a process called spaghettification, in which it is stretched and elongated due to the intense gravitational pull of the black hole. As it gets closer to the event horizon, the point of no return, the object will experience extreme tidal forces and be torn apart into smaller pieces.

2. What happens to the object's mass when it is dropped into a black hole?

The mass of the object remains the same, but it becomes infinitely compressed at the singularity of the black hole. This means that the object's mass is still present, but it is concentrated in an infinitely small point, making it essentially disappear from our observable universe.

3. Can anything escape from a black hole?

According to current theories, nothing can escape from a black hole once it has crossed the event horizon. This includes light, which is why black holes are "black" and cannot be seen. However, some theories suggest that tiny particles, such as Hawking radiation, may be able to escape from a black hole.

4. Does the size of the black hole affect how objects are affected when dropped into it?

Yes, the size of the black hole does affect how objects are affected when dropped into it. The larger the black hole, the stronger its gravitational pull, and the more intense the spaghettification process will be for objects that are dropped into it.

5. Can a black hole be destroyed or changed by dropping objects into it?

No, dropping objects into a black hole does not change or destroy the black hole itself. The black hole will continue to exist and maintain its properties, such as mass and gravitational pull, regardless of what is dropped into it.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
67
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
996
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
760
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
686
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
96
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
63
Views
3K
Back
Top