http://camoo.freeshell.org/25.8.pdf" [Broken](adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Laura

Latex source below. I won't be changing this if I edit the file, it's just for convenience if you want to grab latex code.

n sec. 25.8, he

says "recall the dual $^\ast F$ of the Maxwell tensor F. We could imagine

a 'dual' U(1) gauge connection that has $^\ast F$ as its bundle curvature"

and then he says there's a problem with using the dual curvature of a

nonabelian gauge. First, though, what happens if you try to dualize the

abelian electromagnetic gauge?

If you have the Maxwell tensor $F_{ab}$, you can recover a vector

potential $A$ from it: $$A_b(\vec{x}) = \int_0^1 {uF_{ab}x^adu}$$

Similarly, if you take the Hodge dual $^\ast F_{ab}$ of $F_{ab}$, you can

define a gauge potential from it using a potential $Z$ derived from $^\ast

F_{ab}$ $$Z_b(\vec{x}) = \int_0^1 {u^\ast F_{ab}x^adu}$$

This only works if $d^\ast F_{ab} = 0$, i.e. the charge-current vector

$J=0$. It's an application of the Poincare' lemma, which says that in a

contractible (small, topologically simple) region, a form $F$ with $dF=0$

is the exterior derivative of another form.

I totally wracked my brains about it and I couldn't

see how you could use $^\ast F$ as a gauge curvature \emph{unless} $d^\ast

F=0$.

And after I thought about it some \underline{more} I figured that in the

application of a dual gauge connection, the field probably \emph{would} be

source-free, because the gauge connection's applied to quantum

wavefunctions and when you're at the quantum level, you wouldn't have a

charge-current vector. Any charges and currents would be explicit as

particle wavefunctions, not as the field.

You could add any gradient $d\phi$ to $Z_b$: $Z^\prime_b = Z_b +

\partial\phi/\partial x^b$ gives the same $^\ast F_{ab}$.

From Z you can define a covariant derivative $\nabla_a\psi =

\partial\psi/\partial x^a - ieZ_a\psi$. I guess this connection would be

applied to wavefunctions.

If you have a nonabelian gauge group SU(3), then you'd have a gauge

connection $$\nabla_a\psi= \partial\psi/\partial x^a - C_a\psi$$. Here the

$C_a$'s are matrices in the Lie group algebra of SU(3), operating on a

wavefunction that has a color index. So $\psi = y_1 |red> + y_2 |green> +

y_3 |blue>$ and $|y_1|^2 + |y_2|^2 + |y_3|^2 = 1$, so that the gauge group

SU(3) is acting as transformations on $S^6$. The dimension of the unitary

group U(3) is $3^2=9$ (see sec. 13.10), so the dimension of the Lie

algebra of SU(3), the unitary matrices of determinant 1, is 8. I read

later that there are basis elements for the Lie algebra, trace-free $3

\times 3$ Hermitian matrices called Gell-Mann matrices, for the inventor

of the color theory.

The $C_a$'s are $i\times$ a Hermitian matrix. Since $e^{iH}$ is unitary

if H is Hermitian, this gives you a unitary transform if you're

integrating $\nabla_a$; taking a path integral, with the Lie algebra

elements varying over space should (though I haven't shown it rigorously)

integrate to a matrix in SU(3). The gauge transformation has to be

unitary because it should preserve the inner product $<\psi|\phi>$ of two

wavefunctions. And the gauge transformation should not change the

wavefunction of a 3-quark combination that's been antisymmetrized with

respect to color, because such a particle is a free particle, so the

covariant gauge derivative shouldn't affect it. That implies it has

determinant 1.

The curvature of the connection $\nabla_a\psi= \partial\psi/\partial x^a -

C_a\psi$ is $$\nabla_a\nabla_b - \nabla_b\nabla_a =

\frac{\partial C_a}{\partial x^b} - \frac{\partial C_b}{\partial x^a} +

C_aC_b - C_bC_a$$

This is a 2-form $S_{ab}$ with hidden color indices. It satisfies a

Bianchi identity $\partial S_{[ab}/\partial x^{c]} =0$, I checked.

I tried to find a curvature tensor for a connection with \emph{both} a

spacetime curvature and curvature on the color indices (the gauge

curvature), but it didn't work, that is the commutator $(\nabla_a\nabla_b

- \nabla_b\nabla_a)\psi$ didn't work out to something multiplied by just

$\psi$. Trying to quantize gravity!

You can find the Hodge dual $^\ast S_{ab}$ and try to interpret it as a

curvature tensor. But, with a nonabelian gauge the commutator $C_aC_b -

C_bC_a$ doesn't disappear, so the gauge curvature doesn't look like the

exterior derivative of a form. So the Poincare' lemma might not apply.

If you could show that $^\ast S_{ab}$ doesn't

satisfy the Bianchi identity $\partial S_{[ab}/\partial x^{c]} =0$, that

would show that $^\ast S_{ab}$ isn't a curvature tensor, at least

for a connection of the form $\nabla_a\psi= \partial\psi/\partial x^a -

C_a\psi$ - since I checked that $S_{ab}$ does satisfy this Bianchi

identity! The terms in the Bianchi identity for $^\ast S_{ab}$ are a lot

of complicated stuff that doesn't look like it would have a habit of

summing to 0.

If $^\ast S_{ab}$ \emph{did} satisfy the Bianchi identity $\partial

S_{[ab}/\partial x^{c]} =0$, maybe that would mean it's a curvature tensor

for a connection of the form $\nabla_a\psi= \partial\psi/\partial x^a -

C_a\psi$. I don't know, since the

the Poincare' lemma doesn't necessarily apply.

So that is my best take on a confusing exercise!

\end{document}

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dual gauge curvature

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**