Why is it the case that dual field tensors, e.g. [itex]\widetilde{F}^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}F_{\rho \sigma}[/itex], aren't being included in the Lagrangian? For example, one doesn't encounter terms like [itex]-\frac{1}{4}\widetilde{F}^{\mu\nu}\widetilde{F}_{\mu\nu}[/itex] in QED or [itex]\widetilde{F}^{\mu\nu}W_{\mu}W_{\nu}^{\dagger}[/itex] in vector meson interactions (Phys. Rev. 58, 953). Has it something to do with (discrete) symmetries or..?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dual tensors in Lagrangian

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**