Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Dumb slope question

  1. Aug 20, 2003 #1

    I was looking at a problem from an old test and I got confused about something.

    Q. Find the slope of the tangent line to the given curve at a given point:

    y = x(x^2 + 3)^1/2 ; P(1,2)

    S. First I found the derivative:
    [(x^2 + 3)^1/2] + [(x^2)(x^2 + 3)^-1/2]

    Plugged in the values for x and y at the given point:
    [(4)^1/2] + [(4)^-1/2]

    The choices for answers were:
    a) 2 b) -5/2 c) 3/2 d) 5/2 e) none of these

    Square root of 4 can be + OR - 2, no?

    That would mean I can have 4 possible solutions:
    (4/2) + (1/2) = 5/2
    (4/2) + (-1/2) = 3/2
    (-4/2) + (1/2) = -3/2
    (-4/2) + (-1/2) = -5/2

    Since 3 of these are listed as choices, how did I pick the right one? (I chose d)5/2 and it was marked correct)

    Forgive me if this is shockingly stupid...I am trying to review all my calculus and physics to start classes up again in the winter.
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 20, 2003 #2

    I feel dumb...

    Of course, the original equation must also hold true, which means that (4)^1/2 can only be +2
  4. Aug 21, 2003 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    In addition, "square root" is a FUNCTION which means it can have only one value. The square root of any positive number, a, is, by definition, the POSITIVE number, x, such that x2= a.

    Of course, x2= a has TWO solutions: they are [sqrt](a) and -[sqrt](a).
  5. Aug 24, 2003 #4

    When you say FUNCTION, do you actually mean CONTINOUS ONE-TO-ONE FUNCTION?
  6. Aug 24, 2003 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    When I say FUNCTION, believe it or not, I mean FUNCTION. I do not meant "continuous" since that is not part of the definition of FUNCTION, although, in this problem, since the original post assumed the function was differentiable, it must be continuous. Nor do I mean "one-to-one". I consider "f(x)= x<sup>2</sup>", which is NOT one-to-one (f(2)= f(-2)), a perfectly good function. I do require that functions on the real numbers be "well-defined"- that is, that a single value of x can give only one value of f(x). That is, after all, the distinction between a "function" and "relation".
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook