Dummy Variables in Taylor Series

  • #1
Taylor Series in x-a

Hi,

I've got a question about the use of dummy variables in Taylor Series.

We are asked to expand:

g(x) = xlnx

In terms of (x-2). So originally, I used a dummy variable approach to try and find an answer.

Let t = x-2, so x = t+2.

g(x) = (t+2)ln(2+t)

We're given:

[tex]ln(1+x) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^k}{k}x^k[/tex]

So, I re-arrange g(x) = (t+2)ln[2(1+t/2)] = (t+2)(ln2 + ln(1+t/2)).

Expanding, I get: g(x) = tln2 + tln(1+t/2) + 2ln2 + 2ln(1+t/2).

So [tex]g(x) = 2ln2 + (x-2)ln2 + (x-2)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^k}{k}(x/2-1)^k + [/tex][tex]2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^k}{k}(x/2-1)^k.[/tex]

This is where I get stuck because the book's answer says it should be:

[tex]g(x) = 2ln2 + (1+ln2)(x-2) + \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^k}{k(k-1)2^{k-1}}(x-2)^k[/tex]

I'm sort of close to the answer, but can't quite make the final manipulations to make it work. The book used the method of taking successive derivatives to arrive at that formula, so I know how to do it that way - but is my original method correct as well? If not, why not?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Your method should work out.

Before we work too much on it, why don't you try putting the two sums you have into one and see if it doesn't match up then?

cookiemonster
 

Related Threads on Dummy Variables in Taylor Series

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
983
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
S
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
57
Views
10K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Top