1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Dx/dy vs dy/dx

  1. Mar 31, 2009 #1

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I am reading an old paper and I have came to the passage shown in the picture:

    gunnar.png

    k, CA, CB and V0 are all just some constants.

    I think I know what they did - they differentiated the first equation calculating dpH/dV and then took reciprocals of both sides of the equation. Is it a valid approach?

    I am not able to get the same result solving the first equation for V and calculating dV/dpH then.

    Bear in mind I am mathemathically challenged and English is my second language, I can be missing something obvious.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2009
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 31, 2009 #2

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Yes, this is a valid approach. Let [itex]y=f(x)[/itex]. Obviously, [itex]dy/dx = df/dx[/itex]. Differentiating [itex]y=f(x)[/itex] with respect to y yields

    [tex]1 = \frac{df}{dx}\,\frac{dx}{dy}[/tex]

    Solving for [itex]dx/dy[/itex],

    [tex]\frac{dx}{dy} = \frac 1 {df/dx} = \frac 1 {dy/dx}[/tex]
     
  4. Mar 31, 2009 #3

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    OK, thank you.

    So going the other way (that is solving for V and differentiating), I should get the same result?
     
  5. Mar 31, 2009 #4

    epenguin

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    On the way there I think you slightly simplify and easier see the calculation if you combine terms inside the bracket of first eq. into a single fraction and then express that as

    pH = k - log(CAV0 - CBV) + log(V0 + V) :smile:
     
  6. Mar 31, 2009 #5

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I have to solve for V, having two logs doesn't make it easier.

    I tried both manually and with TI 89, but I can't get the same result as the one printed. Will try later again.
     
  7. Apr 1, 2009 #6

    epenguin

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Borek, I'll put this up here instead of PM as hopefully someone can check it in case of mistakes er typos. :biggrin:

    For the differentiation

    [tex]pH = k - log(\frac{C_AV_0 - C_BV}{V_0 + V})[/tex]

    [tex] = k - log(C_AV_0 - C_BV) +log(V_0 + V) [/tex]

    [tex] = k + \ln 10 [-\ln(C_AV_0 - C_BV) + \ln(V_0 + V)] [/tex]

    Then differentiating

    [tex]\frac{dpH}{dV} = [\frac{- C_B}{C_AV_0 - C_BV} + \frac{1}{V_0 + V}].\ln 10[/tex]

    From this you can already see that the point where the LHS is infinite (the pH against V graph is vertical, or V against pH horizontal) is where
    [tex]V = \frac{V_0C_A}{C_B}[/tex].


    The RHS fractions can be combined giving

    [tex] [\frac{\ln10.(C_A - C_B)V_0}{(C_AV_0 - C_BV)(V_0 + V)}] [/tex]

    If you wanted to invert this into V = a function of [tex]\frac{dV}{dpH}[/tex], rearrange to

    [tex](C_AV_0 - C_BV)(V_0 + V) = (C_A - C_B)V_0.\ln 10.\frac{dV}{dpH}[/tex]

    call the RHS R, say, and then express V by solving the unlovely quadratic in V:

    [tex] -V^2C_B + V V_0(C_A - C_B) + (C_A V_0^2 - R) = 0 [/tex]

    You ought to get the same thing by inverting and differentiating but I think it is more tedious.

    You said you want to invert the first equation anyway. I question whether you do :biggrin: - if it is for plotting it suffices to switch around axes when you plot rather than invert algebraically.

    For inverting algebraically work with H rather than pH; and instead of k (which is probably a p something) I define k = - log M, (M = 10-k)

    Then the first equation becomes

    [tex]H = M + \frac{C_AV_0 - C_BV}{V_0 + V}[/tex]

    which eventually transforms to

    [tex] V = [\frac{C_A - C_B}{C_B + H - M} + 1]V_0[/tex]

    or in terms of pH and k

    [tex] V = [\frac{C_A - C_B}{C_B + 10^{-H} - 10^{-k}} + 1]V_0[/tex]
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2009
  8. Apr 1, 2009 #7

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Hardly surprising - that's the equivalence point :smile:

    Whatever I was doing was just to make sure I understand what is going on. And today I had a time to try again - everything is OK.

    Something is wrong, no need for quadratic here:

    [tex] V = \frac {-(10^k - C_A 10^{pH}) V_0} {10^k + C_B 10^{pH}} [/tex]

    Nah, that's about dV/dpH - volume vs potentiometric answer.

    This is from the Gran method original paper, BTW.

    No, that's log(activity coefficient).

    Thank's for the help. Yesterday I was not sure about this reciprocal thing - it seemed logical, but I have learnt not to trust my instincts when it comes to anything more complicated than multiplication table.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2009
  9. Apr 1, 2009 #8

    epenguin

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I will work through it again with more calm and clearer head (also had computer trouble today). :blushing::biggrin:
    We want to show the students how we make mistakes and are very 'umble. :approve:
     
  10. Apr 1, 2009 #9

    Redbelly98

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Should that be +CB in the numerator (two minus-signs cancel each other)?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Dx/dy vs dy/dx
  1. Dy/dx in calculus (Replies: 2)

  2. A question about dy/dx (Replies: 9)

  3. Question about dy/dx (Replies: 4)

  4. Sin(theta) = dy/dx ? (Replies: 3)

Loading...