I have some questions about what I think is a fairly standard and common short-hand notation used in physics.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Today I watched lecture 2 in the nptelhrd series Classical Physics by Prof. V. Balakrishnan. In it, he models a kind of system called a simple harmonic oscillator, I think using [itex]TC = C \times \mathbb{R} = \mathbb{R}^2[/itex] for a state space (He calls it phase space, but I'll use the more general name, as phase space is said elsewhere to have a coordinate called "momentum" whereas he calls the corresponding coordinate "velocity".), where [itex]C[/itex] is the configuration space of the system, and [itex]TC[/itex] the tangent bundle thereon. He labels points in state space with [itex]q[/itex] and [itex]\dot{q}[/itex], thus [itex](q,\dot{q}) \in \mathbb{R}^2[/itex]. So far so good. Then he writes some equations:

[tex]\ddot{q}=-\omega q, \enspace\enspace\enspace V(q)=\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2q^2, \enspace\enspace\enspace m\ddot{q}=-\frac{\mathrm{d} V}{\mathrm{d} q}(q);[/tex]

[tex]\dot{q}=v, \enspace\enspace\enspace \dot{v}=-\frac{V'(q)}{m}, \enspace\enspace\enspace\frac{\mathrm{d} v}{\mathrm{d} q}=-\frac{\omega^2}{v}q.[/tex]

I'm not satisfied that I understand all of these symbols.

I think [itex]\omega = \sqrt{k/m}[/itex] and [itex]m[/itex] are constants (angular velocity and mass). I think [itex]\ddot{q}[/itex] should mean the value at [itex]t[/itex] of the second derivative of some function whose value at [itex]t[/itex] is labelled [itex]q[/itex]. I'm guessing this implicit function is the first component function, [itex]\gamma_1[/itex], of a curve function, [itex]\gamma : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2 \; |\; t \mapsto (\gamma_1(t),\gamma_2(t))[/itex], whose image is a trajectory in state space, and that this is an arbitrary element of the set of trajectories defined by the differential equation(s). I think [itex]V : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex] is a scalar field on the configuration space [itex]C = \mathbb{R}[/itex].

Does [itex]\dot{q}=v[/itex] mean [itex]\gamma_2(t)=f\circ\gamma_1(t)[/itex] for some unknown function [itex]f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex]?

If so, does does [itex]\dot{v}[/itex] mean [itex](f\circ\gamma_1)'(t)[/itex] or [itex]f'\circ\gamma_1(t)[/itex]? I'm guessing the latter.

Is [itex]-\frac{V'(q)}{m}[/itex] to be read as [itex]-\frac{(V\circ\gamma_1)'(t)}{m}[/itex] or [itex]-\frac{V'\circ\gamma_1(t)}{m}[/itex]? Again, I'd guess the latter.

How about the final equation?

[tex]\frac{\mathrm{d} v}{\mathrm{d} q}=-\frac{\omega^2}{v}q[/tex]

Is it

[itex]f'\circ\gamma_1(t)=-\frac{\omega^2}{f\circ\gamma_1(t)}\gamma_1(t) \enspace ?[/itex]

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dynamical systems notation

Loading...

Similar Threads for Dynamical systems notation |
---|

I Coordinate systems vs. Euclidean space |

A Can I change topology of the physical system smoothly? |

A Split the differential and differential forms |

A Frankel: Geometry of Physics |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**