- #1
WolfOfTheSteps
- 138
- 0
Hello Physics Forum people! :)
The three regions in the figure below contain perfect dialectrics. For a wave in medium 1, incident normally upon the boundary at z = -d, what combination of [itex]\epsilon_{r2}[/itex] and [itex]d[/itex] produces no reflection? Express your answers in terms of [itex]\epsilon_{r1}[/itex], [itex]\epsilon_{r3}[/itex], and the oscillation frequency of the wave, [itex]f[/itex].
http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/1571/problem89gi6.th.jpg
1/2 Wavelength matching equation:
[tex]Z_{in} = Z_L, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox{for } l = n\lambda/2[/tex]
Wavelength/permitivity relation:
[tex]\lambda = \frac{c}{f\sqrt{\epsilon_{r}}}[/tex]
I used the above equations to get
[tex] \lambda_2 = \frac{c}{f\sqrt{\epsilon_{r2}}}[/tex]
[tex] d = \frac{\lambda_2}{2} = \frac{c}{2f\sqrt{\epsilon_{r2}}}[/tex]
I have no idea how to get [itex]\epsilon_{r2}[/itex] in terms of [itex]\epsilon_{r1}[/itex] and [itex]\epsilon_{r3}[/itex].
Here are the book's answers:
[tex]\epsilon_{r2} = \sqrt{\epsilon_{r1}\epsilon_{r3}}[/tex][tex] d = \frac{c}{4f(\epsilon_{r1}\epsilon_{r3})^{1/4}}[/tex]
So at least I'm close with the expression for d. (Except, I don't know why they have a 4 in the denominator instead of a 2).
But how do I find [itex]\epsilon_{r2}[/itex] in terms of [itex]\epsilon_{r1}[/itex] and [itex]\epsilon_{r3}[/itex]? I can't see a way!
Thanks for any help!
Homework Statement
The three regions in the figure below contain perfect dialectrics. For a wave in medium 1, incident normally upon the boundary at z = -d, what combination of [itex]\epsilon_{r2}[/itex] and [itex]d[/itex] produces no reflection? Express your answers in terms of [itex]\epsilon_{r1}[/itex], [itex]\epsilon_{r3}[/itex], and the oscillation frequency of the wave, [itex]f[/itex].
http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/1571/problem89gi6.th.jpg
Homework Equations
1/2 Wavelength matching equation:
[tex]Z_{in} = Z_L, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox{for } l = n\lambda/2[/tex]
Wavelength/permitivity relation:
[tex]\lambda = \frac{c}{f\sqrt{\epsilon_{r}}}[/tex]
The Attempt at a Solution
I used the above equations to get
[tex] \lambda_2 = \frac{c}{f\sqrt{\epsilon_{r2}}}[/tex]
[tex] d = \frac{\lambda_2}{2} = \frac{c}{2f\sqrt{\epsilon_{r2}}}[/tex]
I have no idea how to get [itex]\epsilon_{r2}[/itex] in terms of [itex]\epsilon_{r1}[/itex] and [itex]\epsilon_{r3}[/itex].
Here are the book's answers:
[tex]\epsilon_{r2} = \sqrt{\epsilon_{r1}\epsilon_{r3}}[/tex][tex] d = \frac{c}{4f(\epsilon_{r1}\epsilon_{r3})^{1/4}}[/tex]
So at least I'm close with the expression for d. (Except, I don't know why they have a 4 in the denominator instead of a 2).
But how do I find [itex]\epsilon_{r2}[/itex] in terms of [itex]\epsilon_{r1}[/itex] and [itex]\epsilon_{r3}[/itex]? I can't see a way!
Thanks for any help!
Last edited by a moderator: