E = mc^2 (Why not E = mc^42 )?

  • I
  • Thread starter rootone
  • Start date
  • #1
3,379
942

Main Question or Discussion Point

"Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared."
OK, but why is it considered to be a flat planar thing?
Why not cubed or any dimension you fancy/
Why not E = mc^42 ?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Mister T
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,524
799
"Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared."
OK, but why is it considered to be a flat planar thing?
It's not considered to be a flat planar thing.

You need the exponent of 2 to make the units come out right.
 
  • #3
11,500
5,044
Study the derivation of Special Relativity and you’ll see it’s got a connection to E=1/2 m v^2 of classical physics.
 
  • #4
29,069
5,335
"Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared."
OK, but why is it considered to be a flat planar thing?
Why not cubed or any dimension you fancy/
Why not E = mc^42 ?
What are the units of E and what are the units of mc^42

I have no idea what you mean by “flat planar thing”
 
  • #5
9,331
2,314
Its a simple consequence of Noether and the only reasonable relativistic free particle Lagrangian k*dτ where τ is the proper time and k is a constant to be determined. By definition mass, m, is defined as k/c so the Lagrangian is mcdτ. Apply Noether and you get E = mc^2.

Relativity is strange like that - frame invariance is very constraining.

Why not define m as k/c^42? Try it - you will see that classical mechanics is not correct in the low speed limit.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • #6
3,379
942
Thanks for the replies.
Working on it.
 

Related Threads on E = mc^2 (Why not E = mc^42 )?

  • Last Post
2
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Top