I was reading the derivation of this equation on hyperphysics.com and after searching all over the internet it seems that eveywhere seems to just accept this equation is valid for light, even though a rest mass of 0 would make p equal to 0.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Sorry if I'm being stupid or if this has been asked a million times before but I can't find an explanation anywhere as to why light having zero rest mass gives the equation E = pc, despite p being proportional to the (zero) rest mass of light.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# E = pc derivation

Loading...

Similar Threads - derivation | Date |
---|---|

A Commutator of covariant derivative and D/ds on vector fields | Thursday at 6:20 AM |

I Interesting Derivation of Maxwell's Equations | Mar 11, 2018 |

A Sean Carroll Notes, Schwarzschild derivation, theorem name? | Mar 5, 2018 |

I FRW metric derivation: constraints from isotropic and homoge | Feb 26, 2018 |

I Derivation notation with capital D? | Feb 15, 2018 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**