• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

E2 elimination in β-Lindane

  • #1
232
20

Homework Statement


*How many halogens will be removed in the following E2 reactions combined?*
IMG_20180711_164003.JPG

The Attempt at a Solution


The question's language isn't error free. So, looking at the options, assuming it's *How many halogens will be removed in the following E2 reactions combined?*, the chair comformation of the following compound is:
IMG_20180711_170208.JPG

I know that, for elimination to take place, the chlorines and hydrogens must be anti-periplanar (only possible when both of them are axial). But as you see here, none of the hydrogens turn out to be axial. How does elimination take place then?
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
TeethWhitener
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,677
987
I really want to help with this but I can’t make heads or tails of the question. My best guess is that at some point, you have to do a stereoinverting substitution which gives you the antiperiplanar geometry needed for an E2. Maybe that’s why they say “halogens” instead of “chlorines.”
 
  • #3
232
20
How about substitution with PBr3? It's an SN2 reaction.:olduhh:
But would the reaction stop at mono-substitution?
 
  • #4
232
20
Tell me, is PBr3 ok?
Would it stop at mono-substitution?
 
  • #5
TeethWhitener
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,677
987
Tell me, is PBr3 ok?
Would it stop at mono-substitution?
In this problem, PBr3 is functionally the same as sodium iodide. I doubt it would stop at monosubstitution, but I imagine there’d be a ridiculous mixture of products and I have no idea what the major one would be. But again, you’d have to substitute before you did the elimination.
 
  • #6
232
20
Come on, dude. Think...
Which kind of substitution would work?
 
  • #7
232
20
Hey @TeethWhitener ! I have one more doubt. It's not directly related to this but still...
I have seen reactions where NaI + acetone gives substitution by -I (Finkelstein reaction) and also where it gives elimination. So how do I decide what happens when?
 
  • #8
TeethWhitener
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,677
987
Hey @TeethWhitener ! I have one more doubt. It's not directly related to this but still...
I have seen reactions where NaI + acetone gives substitution by -I (Finkelstein reaction) and also where it gives elimination. So how do I decide what happens when?
Can you give a specific example of NaI giving elimination? NaI is not a strong base, so unless there’s a highly stabilized leaving group or sterically hindered carbocation (so that the nucleophilic addition rate is dramatically slowed), I can’t imagine it’s a very likely scenario.
 
  • #9
232
20
Can you give a specific example of NaI giving elimination? NaI is not a strong base, so unless there’s a highly stabilized leaving group or sterically hindered carbocation (so that the nucleophilic addition rate is dramatically slowed), I can’t imagine it’s a very likely scenario.
Not with NaI alone, but with NaI + acetone, the above example
 
  • #10
232
20
I'll dig for more specific examples, have seen them for sure. Keep this thread watched.
 
  • #11
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,023
755
I have this all very rusty, but I wonder whether in the first reaction, the product won't do a Markovnikov elimination so as to yield a trichlorobenzene.
 
  • #12
TeethWhitener
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,677
987
I have this all very rusty, but I wonder whether in the first reaction, the product won't do a Markovnikov elimination so as to yield a trichlorobenzene.
Generally an E2 mechanism relies on the H and the leaving group being antiperiplanar to each other. In this case, they're all synperiplanar gauche to one another. However, I imagine if this reaction were actually performed, you'd get an intractable mixture of products.
 
  • #13
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,023
755
Generally an E2 mechanism relies on the H and the leaving group being antiperiplanar to each other.
More specifically, an E2 elimination. I would have rather expected an E2 substitution, followed by an elimination. Here, I- is a better nucleofuge than OH-.
 
  • #14
232
20
I would have rather expected an E2 substitution, followed by an elimination. Here, I- is a better nucleofuge than OH-.
No, I think they just mean to ask two different reactions from the same reactant. We need to treat these as two different cases. Look at options (c) 8 & (d) 10. They need the halogens removed in the E2 reactions combined.
Substitutions would be unlikely due to the alc. KOH unless you add some other reagent first, like 3 mol equiv. PBr3 in a polar aprotic solvent
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on E2 elimination in β-Lindane

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
628
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top