Easy but interesting.

  • Thread starter tehno
  • Start date
360
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Find a general equation of geodesics on cylinder's surface.
What's the name of these curves?
:cool:
 

Answers and Replies

mathwonk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
10,742
918
just a guess, cycloids? or if they are unnamed we can call them "tehnos"!
 
360
0
They are not cycloids mathwonk.Funny thing :the tehnicians of various fields are familar with them.The things shaped that way have interesting properties and important applications.
 
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,771
7
circular helixes?

A general param would be...

[tex]\gamma(t) = (a\cos(ct),a\sin(ct),bt)[/tex]

up to a rigid motion
 
Last edited:
George Jones
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,231
785
circular helixes?

A general param would be...

[tex]\gamma(t) = (a\cos(ct),a\sin(ct),bt)[/tex]

up to a rigid motion
Yes, because a cylinder is flat!
 
Yes, because a cylinder is flat!
For a given value of "flat"

[tex]\kappa_1 \kappa_2 = 0[/tex] to be exact.

Edit:
As a minor point of interest, if one considers that the gauusian curvature of the cylinder is zero, and thus that we can form a cylinder from a flat plane, then straight lines on the plane, become helixs on the cylinder.

But is it true that all geodesics are isomorphic under an isometry of this kind. If the gaussian curvature between two surface is equal, can we identify geodesics on one surface with those on the other?
 
Last edited:
255
0
But is it true that all geodesics are isomorphic under an isometry of this kind. If the gaussian curvature between two surface is equal, can we identify geodesics on one surface with those on the other?
Well, the simply-connected cover of both surfaces is the plane and each geodesic of a given surface is the image of a line in the plane under the covering map. So, I think the answer is, yes (sort of): given a geodesic on one surface, we look at its inverse image in R^2. This will be a family of lines (maybe infinite, maybe not). Then take the geodesics in the second surface corresponding to those lines.

So, we can associate a family of geodesics of one surface for every geodesic of the other.
 
mathwonk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
10,742
918
i think i was thinking of helices. i gues cycloids are those curves you get when you mark a point on a penny and roll it right?
 
mathwonk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
10,742
918
it is a pretty easy problem since all you have to do is unroll the cylinder to a rectangle.
 
So, I think the answer is, yes (sort of): given a geodesic on one surface, we look at its inverse image in R^2.
But, what about surfaces with non zero curvature?
 
255
0
But, what about surfaces with non zero curvature?
Yeah, I guess you could do the same procedure for the non-zero curvature as long as its constant.

For constant negative Gaussian curv., the simply-connected cover would be the hyperbolic plane. For positive, it would be the 2-sphere.

of course, i'm assuming the two surfaces have the same curvature *and* that there isn't anything too aberrant about either's topology, i.e. both are connected and complete (when unioned with its boundary) etc. etc.
 
360
0
it is a pretty easy problem since all you have to do is unroll the cylinder to a rectangle.
That's why I classified the problem under "easy".
Helices ,as quasar987 said, is the correct answer.:smile:
 

Related Threads for: Easy but interesting.

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Top