Is There Only One Intersection Point on the y=2^2 Curve for the Tangent Line at P(x0, x0^2)?

  • Thread starter danne89
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, we are trying to prove the uniqueness of the tangent line to a parabola at a specific point. This is trivial because the slope of the tangent is the same at all points on the parabola and all tangents intersect at the same point (the tangent point). The parabola is also symmetric over the y-axis, but this does not affect the uniqueness of the tangent. Additionally, a line can only intersect a parabola at most twice, and tangents count as two intersections. Therefore, the tangent line at a specific point on a parabola is unique.
  • #1
danne89
180
0
Please help me prove that it doesn't exist any other intersect point than P(x0, x0^2) on the y=2^2 curve, for the tangent line in the very same point.

My work:
y=x^2
l(x)=f¨(x0)(x-x0)+x0^2
= 2x0(x-x0)+x0^2
= 2x0x-2x0^2 + x0^2
= 2x0x - x0^2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You mean to prove the uniqueness of the tangent to a parabola in one certain (albeit arbitrary) point...?That's trivial.The slope is the same (unique) and they all pass through the same point (namely,the tangence point),therefore,all tangents coincide.

Unless,you meant something else...

Daniel.
 
  • #3
Hey, isn't the slope the same in two points (symmetry over the y-axis.) ?

Edit: Ohh, my no. It's mirrored...
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Yes,it picks up the minus (due to the cosine,which is negative,once you enter [itex] (\pi/2,\pi) [/itex])...

Daniel.
 
  • #5
in general a line can only intersect a parabola twice at most and tangent intersections count as 2. done.

i.e. when you substiotute the parametrization for the loine into the poarabola equation you get a quadratic which can have only 2 roots, and tangents are exactly those points where the root is a double root.
 

What is "Easy proof"?

"Easy proof" is a concept that refers to a simple and straightforward method or process for demonstrating the validity of a statement or claim.

How is "Easy proof" different from other types of proof?

"Easy proof" is typically distinguished by its simplicity and accessibility, making it more easily understandable and replicable for a wider audience compared to other complex or technical forms of proof.

Can "Easy proof" be used in scientific research?

Yes, "Easy proof" can be applied in scientific research to support or refute hypotheses, as long as it follows proper scientific methodology and is based on reliable evidence and data.

Can "Easy proof" be subjective or biased?

In theory, "Easy proof" should not be affected by subjectivity or bias, as it relies on logical reasoning and empirical evidence. However, it is important to critically evaluate the validity and reliability of the evidence being used in the proof.

Are there any limitations to "Easy proof"?

While "Easy proof" may be effective in demonstrating the validity of simple statements or claims, it may not always be applicable or sufficient for more complex or nuanced ideas. It is important to consider the context and scope of the statement being proved before relying solely on "Easy proof".

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
821
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top