1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Easy question?

  1. May 12, 2005 #1
    During the fission of an atom of uranium-235, 200 Mev are released. If the average time between generations of fission reaction is 10e-14 seconds and if each fission reaction gives rise to two fissions in the next generation, calculate the time required to go from the first fission to 100 Kw output.

    200mev=200000000ev=0.000,000,000,032jouls per sec
    31250000000000reactions per second to make 1kw
    now my thinking was (long version) 1x2 till i reached 3125000000000000 and took how many x2s it took to reach 3125000000000000 and x taht by 10e-14 but taht didnt work any help is appreaciated
    i know its easy (or it should be) i just cant figure it out at the moment
    Last edited: May 12, 2005
  2. jcsd
  3. May 12, 2005 #2
    perhaps this question is harder than i think for the great minds that roam these fourms cannot direct me in the correct direction
  4. May 12, 2005 #3
    i formula perhaps? maybe a hint like what number it starts with? anything? no? sigh...
  5. May 13, 2005 #4
    wow no one could help me with this question?
  6. May 13, 2005 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    All those zeros are too scary for most of us to deal with. Your approach is basically correct, but it would be easy to miscount the number of generations. How many x2s do you think it takes?

    Do you know about logarithms and exponentials?
  7. May 13, 2005 #6
    yes i know about exponentials (notation correct?) umm i think i got to 45 or something this was yesterday
    logarithms i might know about them
    3.13e13=1kw 3.13e15=100kw
    i can change all the zeros to 3.13e15 if you like and 3.2e-11 there ya go
  8. May 13, 2005 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Ideally, you would like to use logarithms for this problem, but your approach would work to get the answer to the nearest whole number of generations. 45 generations is way more than the number needed. I agree with your calculation of the number of reactions per second that you need to achieve. To get the number of generations, without using logarithms, you need to start with the initial number of reactions per second and double that until the rate is high enough. You need to check your calculation of the original rate (reactions per second) and the number of doubling generations. If you use logarithms, you can find the number of generations to a fraction instead of a whole number. If you don't know how to do that, and want to, we can return to it after you get the nearest (or better yet, rounded up) whole number correct.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Easy question?
  1. Easy Question (?) (Replies: 1)

  2. Easy question (Replies: 7)

  3. Easy question (Replies: 5)

  4. Easy Question? (Replies: 2)

  5. An easy question (Replies: 0)