- #1

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter gary350
- Start date

- #1

- #2

BvU

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 15,267

- 4,244

3 1 4 1 5 9 2 6 5

But somehow I also remember the 3 5 9 that follow ( from my first TI-50 )

- #3

No need! Just remember the fundamental theorem of Physics,$$\pi = e = \sqrt{g}$$

- #4

Mark44

Mentor

- 36,681

- 8,678

"Close enough for government work..."No need! Just remember the fundamental theorem of Physics,$$\pi \approx e \approx \sqrt{g}$$

- #5

hutchphd

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2022 Award

- 5,348

- 4,515

mmmmmmmm.....pie.

- #6

BvU

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 15,267

- 4,244

Don't work for no ##\quad## ctrl-shift-G bleep ##\quad## government !

- #7

Infrared

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 988

- 550

The units on this one bother me... And no, before you ask, I never got used to Gaussian units either!$$\sqrt{g}$$

Last edited:

- #8

Filip Larsen

Gold Member

- 1,627

- 553

As a young mind I was able to do around 50 decimals if I trained often enough (that was without any particual memo-technique). Now, all those years later, the first 18 has somehow gotten stuck in memory and since I rarely need more than that as an engineer I'm quite happy I put in the effort back then

- #9

BvU

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 15,267

- 4,244

Tell us about those rare occasions !rarely need more than that as an engineer

- #10

Filip Larsen

Gold Member

- 1,627

- 553

Tell us about those rare occasions !

They are pretty rare indeed. So rare, actually, that such occasion is still pending for me personally. But given how computer chips already are produced in nano-scale and humanity any time soon ought to start construction of some kind of Dyson sphere, that is, if we ever want to become a respectable member of the local community of astro-engineering civilizations, I guess is just a matter of time before those last few decimals becomes significant and THEN its going quite handy not having to look them up all the time.

- #11

mpresic3

- 377

- 267

It turned the discrepancies were traced to the value of pi being read into the program. The error was traced to the coder who entered the value of pi in the database as 3.14. He was asked where he obtained the value. The coder took out his HP calculator and pressed the pi key. For us old time HP calculator operators, we remember the default display of constants was "fix-2", so that only the first two digits were displayed. Apparently, the coder thought this value was exact, or at least close enough.

- #12

- #13

BvU

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 15,267

- 4,244

Anyway, @Filip Larsen was at 18 digits !

If I ever need 16 digits I use 2*arccos(0) but I do admit that's cheating

- #14

DaveC426913

Gold Member

- 21,364

- 4,832

(An error of less than 1 millimeter error per

And if you need accuracy to more than one part in a million -

- #15

- #16

DaveE

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,823

- 2,475

I seriously question any circumstance in engineering where you need 18 digits. How accurately do you know the yield strength of the steel your using, the value of the capacitor in your circuit, the fuel flow rate in your engine? Can you really measure your distances in meters to 1/100 the size of a proton?

As a young mind I was able to do around 50 decimals if I trained often enough (that was without any particual memo-technique). Now, all those years later, the first 18 has somehow gotten stuck in memory and since I rarely need more than that as an engineer I'm quite happy I put in the effort back then

I'm ok with people that want to play memory games for entertainment, but engineers need to know about significant digits, and the relative magnitude and accuracy of real world stuff. There's often nothing wrong with using 18 digits, but others might think you don't really understand "the art of approximation".

- #17

BvU

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 15,267

- 4,244

Engineers use slide rules

- #18

DaveE

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,823

- 2,475

They got Buzz and Neil to the moon and back. Lots of impressive stuff was built with 3 significant digits, back in the day. Granted not as impressive as what consumers can buy today. No LHC or LIGO in 1970.Engineers use slide rules

Anyway, for your amusement:

More here: https://www.sliderulemuseum.com/

- #19

DaveE

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,823

- 2,475

Uh oh. I've hijacked anther thread, haven't I? Sorry, I'll shut up now.

- #20

Mark44

Mentor

- 36,681

- 8,678

Just slide on out before you break a rule...Uh oh. I've hijacked anther thread, haven't I? Sorry, I'll shut up now.

- #21

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,391

- 1,630

when I have trouble remembering decimals of pi, I just fall back on the handy ramanujan formula:

- #22

Filip Larsen

Gold Member

- 1,627

- 553

I seriously question any circumstance in engineering where you need 18 digits.

As you should. Luckily I never claimed to be using 18 digits for anything in particular, engineering or otherwise, only that those are the number of digits that comes to mind without effort. And I have faith in people, including any budding engineers, who are reading this thread to not come away thinking they now need to include 18 digits in any of their engineering calculations.

However, what I did try to suggest with my with post considering the topic of the thread being how to remember decimals of pi (or any other useful constant for that matter) is that if you train to recite a useful number of them without any special memorization technique when you are young then I would think there is a good chance you can recite them fairly effortless later in life as well.

- #23

BvU

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 15,267

- 4,244

Ah ! Figure of speech, not to be taken literally 😁since I rarely need more than that

- #24

pbuk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,031

- 2,367

No they didn't. There is a good account of the pre-flight computations as well as the real time actions and post-flight analysis at https://history.nasa.gov/afj/index.html.[Slide rules] got Buzz and Neil to the moon and back. Lots of impressive stuff was built with 3 significant digits, back in the day.

The Apollo Guidance Computer had 14 hardware data bits, equivalent to 4.2 decimal digits, but I believe calculations were performed in a software VM in 24 bit (7.2 decimal digit) fixed precision.

- #25

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,391

- 1,630

My google research shows some 3 eras of hand computation of pi. First, Archimedes' method approximating area of a circle by that of a many sided polygon, eventually yielding a few dozen digits. Second, Taylor series for arctan augmented by addition formulas, yielding over 100 digits. (Euler seems to have published variants of this method but not to have actually calculated any himself. Interestingly in his book on Analysis of Infinities, he simply states the first 120 or so digits of pi, with an error (only) in about the 112th place.) Third, sophisticated formulas of Ramanujan, including the comparatively simple one above in post #21.

I just checked it for k=0, i.e. only using one term of that series, and I got 6 decimal places of accuracy, roughly 3.14159273, and two more with a second term. (Google says that I should get 8 more places of accuracy with each term, so my calculator is off somewhere.)

To top that with the elegant series pi/4 = 1 -1/3 + 1/5 -1/7 ..., seems naively to take about a million terms!

I just checked it for k=0, i.e. only using one term of that series, and I got 6 decimal places of accuracy, roughly 3.14159273, and two more with a second term. (Google says that I should get 8 more places of accuracy with each term, so my calculator is off somewhere.)

To top that with the elegant series pi/4 = 1 -1/3 + 1/5 -1/7 ..., seems naively to take about a million terms!

Last edited:

- #26

gary350

- 232

- 39

No need! Just remember the fundamental theorem of Physics,$$\pi = e = \sqrt{g}$$

e = energy?

g = gravity?

- #27

$$e = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!} = \lim_{m\rightarrow \infty} \left(1+ \frac{1}{m} \right)^m \approx 2.718281828459045$$whilst ##g## is the gravitational field strength on the Earth's surface, which as pointed out by @Infrared must in this case be the dimensionless value of that quantity when expressed in the SI, to maintain dimensional homogeneity.

I might take this opportunity to mention that, in case anyone didn't notice, the fundamental theorem of Physics isn't particularly fundamental. Or a theorem, for that matter.

I might take this opportunity to mention that, in case anyone didn't notice, the fundamental theorem of Physics isn't particularly fundamental. Or a theorem, for that matter.

Last edited by a moderator:

- #28

Mark44

Mentor

- 36,681

- 8,678

e is the Euler number, the base of the natural logarithme = energy?

g = gravity?

g is the acceleration due to gravity (about ##9.81 \frac{\text m}{\text{sec}^2}## or about ##32.2 \frac{\text {ft}}{\text{sec}^2}##)

- #29

Mikestone

- 21

- 9

Sir, I bear a rhyme excelling

In mystic verse and magic spelling

Celestial sprites elucidate

All my own striving can't relate

Just count the letters in each word.

- #30

DennisN

Gold Member

- 1,934

- 6,128

I remember how to press π on my calculator. Pi is ca 3 if my memory serves me.

- #31

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 20,987

- 5,043

I prefer this one

Share:

- Replies
- 16

- Views
- 778

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 511

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 142

News
Nobel on the way?

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 582

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 371

- Last Post

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 585

- Last Post

- Replies
- 25

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 946