Stargazing Effects of a massive object on light and its relation to the 1919 Eclipse

  • Thread starter JM2107
  • Start date

JM2107

[SOLVED] Effects of a massive object on light and its relation to the 1919 Eclipse

What happens to light as it passes near a massive object and how it this principle or concept connected to the 1919 lunar eclipse where Einstein’s Photoelectric theory was proved (both the apparent and actual location of the stars were revealed around the area of the eclipse?

Thanks for any responses in advance.
 

Integral

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,185
55
It was not Photoelectric effect that was (perhaps falsly) verified during the 1919 eclipse put General Relativity. The observations were of the position of a star that was being oculted during the eclipse. GR predicted that the postion of the star would shift as the disk of the sun passed in front of it.

It is not clear in this day and age that the instrumentation and the methods uses were actually up to the task. It may well be that the verifing data was more wishfull thinking then sound numbers. Of course, since that time the measurements have been repeated modern equipment and methods and the theory has been verified many times over.
 

marcus

Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,713
783
Originally posted by JM2107
What happens to light as it passes near a massive object i]

Thanks for any responses in advance.


If a ray of light passes within a distance R from an object with mass M then it is bent by an angle which can be calculuated
using this formula from Einstein's 1916 paper on general relativity:


angle in radians = 4GM/c2R


It was this angle that Eddington's team was trying to check
when they observed the Pleiades during the 1919 eclipse of the sun. They thought they verified that the formula was right---it was headline news "Einstein Proved Correct!" and so on.
 

marcus

Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,713
783
I hope no one is vexed by this side comment and proceeds to declare me out of the mainstream for mentioning it
but I will take that risk.

In natural units (c=G=hbar=1) the sun's mass is 93E36
and a million miles is E44.

the formula for the angle is simply 4M/R radians

But 4M is 37E37

So, if a ray of light passes a million miles from the sun's center,
it is bent by the angle you get by dividing 37E37 by E44.


37E37/E44 = 37E-7 radians-------3.7E-6-----3.7 microradians

It seems to me that natural units, which so many physicists use nowadays in research and theoretical papers, actually help here by making the formula 4M/R so much simpler. It is a mess to do
the formula in metric with numbers like 6.673E-11 for G and so on.

**********

There is a side issue of how did I know the mass of the sun is 93E36.

that is easy to remember if you can remember that the distance to it is 93 million miles.

Because in natural units M=RV2, where R is the radius of a small object's circular orbit and V is the orbit speed. In the case of the earth (small, in roughly circular orbit) V = E-4 and R=93E44 (93 million miles) so the mass of the sun is quick to compute just by multiplying

M = RV2 = 93E44 x E-8 = 93E36

Again you quite possibly cannot remember the mass of the sun in kilograms and would probably not like to calculate it from what you do know about distance and orbit speed because it would involve messy numbers like 6.673E-11 for G and so on. So natural units are somewhat more practical in this context.
As well as increasingly mainstream (some John Baez discussion on Usenet bears on this)

But if you can remember the mass of the sun in kilograms then of course go ahead and use the metric formula for the angle mentioned earlier

angle = 4GM/c^2R

instead of 4M/R
 

Alexander

Originally posted by JM2107
What happens to light as it passes near a massive object and how it this principle or concept connected to the 1919 lunar eclipse where Einstein’s Photoelectric theory was proved (both the apparent and actual location of the stars were revealed around the area of the eclipse?

Thanks for any responses in advance.
Not Photoelectric theory (for which Einstein got Nobel Prize, by the way), but General Relativity theory.

Basicly what you do is to take picture of starry sky at night and during eclipse and superimpose them. Distance between stars (on a photograph) increases slightly when Sun is among them - this means that starlight sligtly bends around Sun.
 

Related Threads for: Effects of a massive object on light and its relation to the 1919 Eclipse

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
76
Views
10K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
585

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top