• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Efficiency of heat engines

  • #1
1,344
32

Homework Statement



Two identical tanks of water are at absolute temperatures ##T_A## and ##T_B## respectively, where ##T_{A} > T_{B}##. The tanks each have a heat capacity ##C##, and they are thermally isolated from their environment. Suppose that a heat engine is installed in contact with the two tanks, in order to extract useful work from their temperature difference.

(a) Suppose that the engine is completely inefficient and generates no work. What will be the final temperature ##T_{f}## of the tanks at equilibrium?

(b) Suppose instead that the engine is the most efficient engine possible. What will be the final temperature ##T_{f}## of the tanks at equilibrium?

(c) How much work will have been generated by the efficient engine of part (b)?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



(a) If the engine is completely inefficient and generates no work, then heat energy is being transferred from the hot tank with temperature ##T_A## to the cold tank with temperature ##T_B##. The tanks are identical, so each of them have the same mass ##m##. Therefore,

##mC(T_{A}-T_{f})=mC(T_{f}-T_{B})##

##\implies T_{f}=\frac{T_{A}+T_{B}}{2}##

Am I correct so far?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
348
80
Yes, you are correct for the part (a)
 
  • #3
1,344
32
For (b), do I have to assume that the tanks are heat baths, so the temperatures of the tanks remain unchanged?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
348
80
No that happens when they have infinite heat capacity.
 
  • #5
1,344
32
Well, if part of the heat energy (being transferred from the hot tank to the cold tank) is sucked out by the heat engine and converted to work, then only the wasted heat energy is absorbed by the cold tank. Will the transfer of the wasted amount of heat energy from the hot tank to the cold tank determine the final temperature of the two tanks?

Now, doesn't efficiency = ##1 - \frac{T_{B}}{T_{A}}## mean that the wasted heat energy = ##\frac{T_{B}}{T_{A}}(C)(T_{f}-T_{B})##?

Where do I go from here?

P.S. : In my answer to part (a), the ##m##'s will be missing because ##C = mc##.
 
  • #6
348
80
Assume that at the end of the cycle both become Tf', which will be more than (TA + TB)/2 and the total energy available is C(TA - TB), which was wasted in part (a) of the problem with no work done. So now do you understand what is the correct expression of wasted energy for part (b)? You are using the Carnot formula for a non-Carnot engine. You need to just use the everyday idea of what is efficiency!
 
Last edited:
  • #7
1,344
32
Do the temperatures of the tanks necessarily have to become the unique final equilibrium temperature ##T'_{f}## at the end of the cycle, and not at some other point of the cycle?
 
  • #8
348
80
This will not be a reversible process so there is cycle but not reversible, in the sense that the engine might come back to its original state but te reservoirs have not come back to original temperatures at least. Just think in terms of the end results.
 
  • #9
1,344
32
I think you misunderstood my question. I am not asking about the reversibility of the heat engine cycle.

I am asking how you knew that it's only at the end of the cycle, and not at some other point in the cycle, that the tanks reach the equilibrium temperature. Is this because, once the tanks reach equilibrium temperature, then no heat exchange between them is possible, so that the heat engine cannot extract heat energy to do useful work?
 
  • #10
348
80
Exactly there comes the idea of reversibility, in a reversible process system and reservoirs are all the time in equilibrium but in all other processes we consider them in equilibrium at certain points after which or before which there is no change in the macroscopic variables in this case temperature. The problem is also asking about the final temperature of the reservoirs after you have got the necessary work from the system/systems. As far as end states are concerned the thermodynamic laws hold for them.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
1,344
32
Why is the final equilibrium temperature of the tanks greater than ##\frac{T_{A}+T_{B}}{2}##?
 
  • #12
348
80
because if it is more more heat will be wasted, which the system does not have.
 
  • #13
1,344
32
I am having difficulty understanding your explanation. Would you please elaborate?
 
  • #14
569
85
Why is the final equilibrium temperature of the tanks greater than ##\frac{T_{A}+T_{B}}{2}##?
I, as I think you do, believe the final temperature for Part (b) is less than (TA+TB)/2.

Have you solved Parts (b) and (c)?
 
  • #15
1,344
32
I haven't.

Can you please provide the first two to three lines of the solutions so I know exactly how to proceed?

I am completely lost.
 
  • #16
569
85
First, clearly define variables:

TA, TB, Tf, C=mc as above.
Ta = variable temperature of tank A.
Tb = variable temperature of tank B.
QA = variable heat leaving tank A and entering engine.
QB = variable heat leaving engine and entering tank B.
W = variable work produced by engine.

We know the engine will have Carnot efficiency as you've stated in #5, but it's a variable = (1-Tb/Ta).

We know the efficiency is also W/QA.

We know the efficiency changes during the course of the process, so an integration is needed.

Do a differential energy balance on the engine.
Combine with differential temperature changes in the tanks, e.g., dQA = -CdTa.
Eliminate W and Q's.
 

Related Threads on Efficiency of heat engines

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
604
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
20K
Replies
2
Views
816
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
8K
Top