Efficiency of mag lev

This is a thread to discuss the efficiency of magnetic levetation a la monorails. I really don't know how it would compare to the traditional surface contact-based transportation. If you have some knowledge on this or know where to find it, please speak up.

The lack of friction would definitely be a plus. However, you have to provide the energy to lift the object(s) off the ground.
 

drag

Science Advisor
1,055
0
Greetings !

I don't really know about the energy comparison,
I'm pretty sure the efficiency is higher because
you don't use motors but the energy is abviously
probably greater. The primary problem with such
trains is not the energy but rather the costs of
the monorail which is extremely high (several million
dollars per mile for the train in Japan, for example).

Live long and prosper.
 

LURCH

Science Advisor
2,546
117
Originally posted by Dissident Dan
This is a thread to discuss the efficiency of magnetic levetation a la monorails. I really don't know how it would compare to the traditional surface contact-based transportation. If you have some knowledge on this or know where to find it, please speak up.

The lack of friction would definitely be a plus. However, you have to provide the energy to lift the object(s) off the ground.
We must distinguish between the different types of maglev. There is the http://www.skytran.net/press/sciam01.htm, which uses the motion of the train along the track to induce magnetic current in the track, using a Halbach array. This tech is cheaper to build, because generators are not needed to power the track. But it offers less savings, because the magnets cannot be used for propulsion. The main savings here is just lower friction.

Then, there are the more traditional

electromagnet maglevs,which are much more expensive and complicated to build, but offer additional benefits. In this scheme, the propulsion of the train is powered by a stationary source external to the train. This means that the power source is not part of the weight that needs to be transported.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

tot

43
0
doesn't a lot of power have to be used to run the electromagnets that lift the entire weight of the train?
It seems that a maglev train would be highly inefficient, but very quiet, fast and smooth.
Can somebody verify this?

because in a train with wheels, the lift is provided by the contact of the train with the ground. so let's say the train weights 7x10^6kilograms.
you have to power enough electromagnets on the train, and on the ground to lift 7x10^6kg, as well as enough forward force to accelerate the train as well as fight off the forces of wind drag.... unless I'm missing something.. it sounds very inefficient
 
Last edited:

NascentOxygen

Mentor
9,215
1,056
doesn't a lot of power have to be used to run the electromagnets that lift the entire weight of the train?
Hence the quest for suitable superconductors goes on .....
 
285
26
Not my area, but from what I have read an object lifted by a virtual magnet superconductor, does not use "any" energy for the lift. The only energy is to keep the superconductor COLD! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_levitation
So when the force of gravity and the magnet/virtual magnet repulsion equal, the object floats.
 
44
0
I saw the wire on the rail for high speed train.(300km/h) i ever saw the cable with very big diameter for mag-left train in shanghai(about 400-450km/h). so i think the mag lev need much more electricity.
 

Related Threads for: Efficiency of mag lev

Replies
1
Views
8K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
11
Views
11K
  • Posted
Replies
12
Views
14K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top