1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Efflux problem is my work valid?

  1. Feb 23, 2005 #1

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I have completed this problem, and would like to know if my work is correct:

    According to Torricelli's theorem, the velocity of a fluid draining from a hole in a tank is v ~= (2gh)1/2, where h is the depth of water above the hole. Let the hole have an area A0, and the cylindrical tank have cross-sectional area Ab >> A0. Derive a formula for the time to drain the tank completely from an initial depth h0.

    My work:

    The volume flow rate out of the hole is equal to the rate of change of the volume in the tank:

    [tex] A_0 v = \frac{dV}{dt} = A_b \frac{dh}{dt} [/tex]

    [tex] v = \sqrt{2gh} = \frac{A_b}{A_0} \frac{dh}{dt} [/tex]

    Assuming that we start from t0 = 0, and that the tank is drained after a time T, we can separate variables and integrate:

    [tex] \int_0^T {dt} = T = \frac{A_b}{A_0} \int_{h_0}^0 {\frac{dh}{\sqrt{2gh}}} [/tex]

    One thing that bothered me was that I never made use of the information that Ab >> A0. I thought at first maybe I was supposed to make some approximation somewhere based on that. But then I dug out my first year physics text and saw that Torricelli's theorem was derived from Bernoulli's eqn, and that this information regarding the two areas was used in the derivation. So maybe that's the only reason they gave it to us. Still, is everthing else ok?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 23, 2005 #2

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Of course, you did use the fact that A[sub[0[/sub]<<Ab when you assumed that you could stop the integral at the top of the hole. You are treating that hole the water is coming out of as a point.
     
  4. Feb 24, 2005 #3

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Yeah, makes sense to me if the hole is in the side of the container. But Torricelli's thm is valid for the hole in the bottom of the container, which is what it shows in the diagram. How should it be interpreted then?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Efflux problem is my work valid?
Loading...