1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Ehrenfest theorem

  1. Jun 11, 2009 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Use the generalized Ehrenfest theorem to show that any free particle with the one-dimensional Hamiltonian operator

    H= p^2/2m obeys

    d^2<x^2> / dt^2 = (2/m)<p^2>,



    2. Relevant equations

    The commutation relation xp - px = ih(bar)



    3. The attempt at a solution


    d^2<x^2> / dt^2 = (1/m)(d<p^2>/dt)


    H = p^2/2m + V(x)

    then [x^2,H] = x^2[(p^2/2m) + V(x)) - ((p^2/2m) + V(x))x^2 = (1/2m)[x^2,p^2]


    [x^2,p^2] = xxpp - ppxx = 2ih(bar)(xp + px)

    I'm stuck at this point?

    am i on the right track?

    the < > brackets represent the expectation value
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 11, 2009 #2

    Cyosis

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    You're not using the generalized Ehrenfest theorem from the looks of it. T

    The theorem you want to use is:
    [tex]
    \frac{d \langle A \rangle}{dt}=\frac{1}{i \hbar}\langle [A,H] \rangle+\left\langle \frac{dA}{dt} \right\rangle
    [/tex]

    With A an operator in the Schrodinger picture. Now use A=x and A=p.
     
  4. Jun 12, 2009 #3
    According to my text book the generalized Ehrenfest theorem is

    what you have put but without the derivative term of A at the end
     
  5. Jun 12, 2009 #4

    Cyosis

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Don't forget the tex bracket. Well you could write it like that, because the last term in my expression is usually zero for operators in the Schrodinger picture.

    It wasn't clear from your original post that you were actually using that one however.

    That said can you evaluate the equation for x and p?
     
  6. Jun 12, 2009 #5
    Which x and p ?

    the term (xp + px) ?

    I really thought i was on the right track.

    I'm not sure where to go now. Pointers?
     
  7. Jun 12, 2009 #6
    If

    [x^2,p^2] = xxpp - ppxx = 2ih(bar)(xp + px)

    Then how do I find the term (xp + px) ?
     
  8. Jun 12, 2009 #7

    Cyosis

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Write the commutator as [itex][x^2,pp][/itex] and use the commutator identity [itex][A,BC]=[A,B]C+B[A,C][/itex] then do the same for the x^2.
     
  9. Jun 12, 2009 #8
    I'm still not following

    I'm given the commutation relations in my text as


    [x^2,p^2] = xxpp - ppxx = 2ih(bar)(xp + px)

    [xp,p^2] = xxpp - ppxx = 2ih(bar)(p^2)

    [px,p^2] = xxpp - ppxx = 2ih(bar)(p^2)
     
  10. Jun 12, 2009 #9

    Cyosis

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    You can let a test function work on it. Evaluate (xp+px)f(x).
     
  11. Jun 12, 2009 #10
    This makes no sense to me. I think i'm going to call it a day. Thanks for all your help Cyosis
     
  12. Jun 12, 2009 #11

    Cyosis

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Do you know how you can show that [itex][x,p]=i \hbar[/itex] in the first place?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Ehrenfest theorem
  1. Ehrenfest's theorem (Replies: 2)

  2. Ehrenfest's Theorem (Replies: 4)

Loading...