1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Eigenvalues and Laplace

  1. Mar 9, 2008 #1
    hi, can some one give me any hints how to solve this problem? thank you


    i tried to type it here but it dint come up so i uploaded a picture with the problem.

    Thank you so much


    Recall that for an nxn matrix A with distinct eigenvalues [tex]\lambda[/tex] [tex]_{F}[/ktex], k=1,2,...,n


    e^{At} = \sum^{n}_{k=1} Z_{k}e^{\lambda_{k}t}

    By taking the Laplace Transform of both sides (or otherwise) show that
    \sum^{n}_{k=1}Z_{k}= I_{n}

    Where I_{n} is the nxn identity matrix
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 9, 2008 #2
    Although stated in a very horrible way, what is asked here boils down to show that, if A is diagonalizable, one can compute [itex]e^{At}[/itex] by only computing the diagonal entries after diagonalizing. Keep in mind that [itex]\mathcal{L}(e^{At}) = (sI - A)^{-1}[/itex].

    So once you have the diagonal form employ the inverse laplace transformation.

    I am sure that you can do it, so think about it for a while...
     
  4. Mar 9, 2008 #3
    okay maybe i read it totally wrong but if you know that

    [tex] e^{At} = \sum^{n}_{k=1} Z_{k}e^{\lambda_{k}t} [/tex]

    for all t then use it fot t=0 and get

    [tex] I = e^{0} = e^{A0} = \sum^{n}_{k=1} Z_{k}e^{\lambda_{k}0} = \sum^{n}_{k=1} Z_{k}[/tex]

    and you are done?
     
  5. Mar 9, 2008 #4
    The sum works with a general form of the following
    [tex]
    \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
    1 & 0 \\
    0 & 0 \\
    \end{array}} \right] + \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
    0 & 0 \\
    0 & 1 \\
    \end{array}} \right] = I
    [/tex]

    So it is directly related with the diagonal form... Thus you can also prove for non-zero t
     
  6. Mar 10, 2008 #5
    ok i have proven this so far
    (SI-A)L(e^(At)) = Identity...but i do not how to prove that this is equal to [tex]\sum^{n}_{k=1}Z_{k}[/tex]

    Any hints? thank you so much
     
  7. Mar 10, 2008 #6
    OK, but that one tells you nothing, how about this? Let A is a diagonal matrix, then for 2x2 case,

    [tex]
    e^{At}= e^{\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
    \alpha & 0 \\
    0 & \beta \\
    \end{array}} \right]t} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
    e^{\alpha t} & 0 \\
    0 & e^{\beta t} \\
    \end{array}} \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
    1 & 0 \\
    0 & 0 \\
    \end{array}} \right]e^{\alpha t} + \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
    0 & 0 \\
    0 & 1 \\
    \end{array}} \right]e^{\beta t}
    [/tex]
    And, then from the previous post,
    [tex]

    \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
    1 & 0 \\
    0 & 0 \\
    \end{array}} \right] + \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
    0 & 0 \\
    0 & 1 \\
    \end{array}} \right] = I

    [/tex]

    Can you see the pattern now?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Eigenvalues and Laplace
  1. Eigenvalue question (Replies: 6)

  2. Eigenvalue question (Replies: 4)

Loading...