1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Eigenvalues of L^2 and Lz^2

  1. Nov 8, 2003 #1
    I'm trying to show the relation between L^2 and Lz where L is total angular momentum and Lz is the z component.

    Given f is an eigenfunction of both L^2 and Lz
    L^2f = [lamb] f Lz f = [mu] f and L^2 = Lx^2 + Ly^2 + Lz^2 then

    <L^2> = < Lx^2 + Ly^2 + Lz^2> = <Lx^2> + <Ly^2> + <Lz^2>

    <L^2> = [inte]f* L^2 f dr = [inte]f* [lamb] f dr
    = [lamb] [inte]f*fdr = [lamb] <f> = [lamb]

    <Lz> = [inte]f* Lz^2 f dr = [inte]f* [mu]^2 f dr = [mu]^2 [inte]f*f dr
    = [mu]^2


    <lz^2> = <L^2> - <Lx^2> - <Ly^2> substituting gives

    [mu]^2 = [lamb] - <Lx^2> - <Ly^2>

    or [mu] squared is less than or equal to [lamb] with equality only when <Lx^2> = <Ly^2> = zero

    I would like to know if the above is correct and is this just another way of saying that Lz^2 <= to L^2 ?
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 8, 2003 #2
    further relations between eigenvalues

    By using the ladder operator L+ and L- that raise or lower the angular momentum by hbar and considering that Lz cannot be less than zero nor more than some finite value lhbar you can show that
    L^2f = hbar^2 * l * (l+1) f and Lz f = hbar m f
    where l = 0,1/2, 1,... and m = -l, -l+1, ... l-1, l

    comparing L^2f and Lz f means
    l(l+1) <= m^2 <= l^2
    with equality only for l = m = 0.

    Asked to comment the implications of this I can only say that Lz^2 is always less than L^2 meaning you always have some Lx and Ly if you have any Lz. Is there more to this?

    This result is supposed to be enforced by the uncertainty relation
    [sig]Lx * [sig]Ly >= hbar/2 * |<Lz>|

    I can't see how to relate the two let alone demonstrate it. Suggestions on how to relate the two would be much appreciated.
  4. Nov 10, 2003 #3

    Tom Mattson

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Not quite: You have to integrate over all of R3, not just the radial coordinate.

    Everything else looks OK.
  5. Nov 10, 2003 #4

    Tom Mattson

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Re: further relations between eigenvalues

    See page 71 of these notes:

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?