I'm reading a text on tensor analysis (on R³), and I don't understand the following exemple...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]P=\frac{1}{2}(a_{ij}+a_{ji})x_ix_j=\frac{1}{2}(a_{ij}x_ix_j+a_{ij}x_jx_i)=a_{ij}x_ix_j[/tex]

To pass from the second to the last equality, he commuted the second pair of [itex]x_jx_i[/itex] into [itex]x_ix_j[/itex]. But he can't do that for it then changes radically the nature of P, for if we redistribute the [itex]a_{ij}[/itex], we are no longer summing according to the Einstein notation.

If what I just said is not clear, consider this. I am asserting that the author did the following in order to pass from the second to the third equality:

[tex]a_{ij}x_jx_i=a_{ij}x_ix_j[/tex]

On the LHS, we are summing over j but not in the RHS. So this commutation changes the nature of the expression.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Einstein notation stuff

Loading...

Similar Threads - Einstein notation stuff | Date |
---|---|

Problem with Einstein notation and Levi-Civita symbol | Sep 6, 2013 |

EINSTEIN Summation notation | Mar 10, 2010 |

Inverse of tensor using Einstein notation | Mar 14, 2009 |

Please me to understand Einstein notation and permutations | Apr 18, 2007 |

Quick question on Einstein Notation | Apr 27, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**