- #1

- 3

- 0

yet Einstein's energy equation is [tex] E=mc^2 [/tex]?

Why is there a different constant (ie [tex] \frac{1}{2}[/tex] and [tex]1[/tex])?

- Thread starter dirtydog
- Start date

- #1

- 3

- 0

yet Einstein's energy equation is [tex] E=mc^2 [/tex]?

Why is there a different constant (ie [tex] \frac{1}{2}[/tex] and [tex]1[/tex])?

- #2

- 35,847

- 4,669

Er... because they are NOT the same beast, so why should they be identical? One is the energy of motion, the other is the REST mass energy.dirtydog said:

yet Einstein's energy equation is [tex] E=mc^2 [/tex]?

Why is there a different constant (ie [tex] \frac{1}{2}[/tex] and [tex]1[/tex])?

Zz.

- #3

arildno

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,970

- 132

You are confusing relativistic energy with classical kinetic energy.

If I remember correctly, the relativistic energy of a particle with rest mass m is given by:

[tex]E_{rel}=\frac{mc^{2}}{\sqrt{1-(\frac{v}{c})^{2}}}\approx{m}c^{2}+\frac{1}{2}mv^{2},v<<c[/tex]

(where v is the measured velocity of the particle)

In the low speed limit, we see that the relativistic energy can be written as the sum of the rest mass energy ([tex]mc^{2}[/tex]) and the classical kinetic energy.

If I remember correctly, the relativistic energy of a particle with rest mass m is given by:

[tex]E_{rel}=\frac{mc^{2}}{\sqrt{1-(\frac{v}{c})^{2}}}\approx{m}c^{2}+\frac{1}{2}mv^{2},v<<c[/tex]

(where v is the measured velocity of the particle)

In the low speed limit, we see that the relativistic energy can be written as the sum of the rest mass energy ([tex]mc^{2}[/tex]) and the classical kinetic energy.

Last edited:

- #4

- 3

- 0

as zapperz says, thery are not the same thing. kinetic energy (KE) is a form of energy that a body has due to its motion, while the other eqn describes the total amt of inherent energy that a body has due to its mass.

therefore for the KE, a body's KE can be increased by increasing its speed. a drop in speed would therefore cause the KE to drop. an obj at rest would then hav 0 KE.

as for E = mc^2, no matter the body is moving or not, the E here remains the same if the body's mass does not change. u can onli vary this E by varying the mass of that body. therefore this eqn gives u the total amt of energy that is 'associated' with a certain mass.

hope that helps to clarify things.

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 6K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 942

- Last Post

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 5K

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 753

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K