Electric Field from a Finite Length, Uniformly Charged Wire (EM, not Gen Phys II)

  • Thread starter jumi
  • Start date
  • #1
28
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

So there's this situation going on:
http://imageshack.us/a/img826/7398/physicsforums.png [Broken]

Going from the definition of an electric field:
(1) [itex]\vec{E} ( \vec{x} ) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} ∫ \frac{\vec{x} - \vec{x'}}{| \vec{x} - \vec{x'} | ^3} ρ( \vec{x'}) d^3x'[/itex]


(2) The [itex]ρ(\vec{x'})d^3x'[/itex] reduces to [itex]λdz'[/itex]. And [itex]\vec{x} - \vec{x'} = x \hat{i} - z' \hat{k} = \sqrt{x^2 + z'^{2}}[/itex].


(3) Now, plugging this information into the electric field equation yields:
[itex]\vec{E} ( \vec{x} ) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \int^{l}_{-l} \frac{\sqrt{x^2 + z'^{2}}}{(\sqrt{x^2 + z'^{2}})^3} λdz'[/itex]


(4) However, the book (Electromagnetism by Pollack and Stump) shows:
[itex]E_{x}(x,0,0) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \int^{l}_{-l} \frac{x}{(\sqrt{x^2 + z'^{2}})^3} λdz' [/itex]

How do we get from (3) to (4)? Why is z' only removed from the numerator?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
14,696
6,235
Your formula (3) is obviously wrong, because on the left-hand side is a vector and on the right-hand side a scalar quantity.

From (1) and (2) you immediately write down (4). So your book is correct. There is no z' in the numerator of the x component!
 
  • #3
1,024
32
so the charged wire is along z axis so by symmetry only x component will survive so
z will be absent in numerator and beware it is a vector.
 
  • #4
28
0
Your formula (3) is obviously wrong, because on the left-hand side is a vector and on the right-hand side a scalar quantity.

From (1) and (2) you immediately write down (4). So your book is correct. There is no z' in the numerator of the x component!
I don't understand how I could just go from (1) and (2) to (4)...

so the charged wire is along z axis so by symmetry only x component will survive so
z will be absent in numerator and beware it is a vector.
Or why the numerator doesn't have a vector magnitude, whereas the demoninator does...


I was, however, able to get the correct answer, just not using the full notation from equation (1).

So I start with: [itex]\vec{E} ( \vec{x} ) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} ∫ \frac{\vec{x} - \vec{x'}}{| \vec{x} - \vec{x'} | ^3} ρ( \vec{x'}) d^3x'[/itex]

And since [itex]d\vec{E}[/itex] generated by [itex]dq[/itex] on the line will be symmetric (i.e. only the x-component will survive), we can say [itex]dE_{x} = d\vec{E}cos(\theta)[/itex].

Therefore: [itex]dE = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{1}{r^2} dq[/itex], where [itex]r = | \vec{x} - \vec{x'}| = \sqrt{x^2 + z'^2}[/itex]

Therefore: [itex]dE_{x} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{1}{x^2 + z'^2} \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2 + z'^2}} λdz' [/itex] from [itex]cos(\theta) = \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2 + z'^2}} [/itex] and [itex] dq = λdz'[/itex]

Which gives the result in the book: [itex]E_{x}(x,0,0) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \int^{l}_{-l} \frac{x}{(\sqrt{x^2 + z'^{2}})^3} λdz' [/itex].

So was I supposed to recognize that I needed to use the cos(θ) relationship from the beginning? I'm also still confused on how the vector difference only acts on the denominator, if I were to just use equation (1).

Thank in advance.
 

Related Threads on Electric Field from a Finite Length, Uniformly Charged Wire (EM, not Gen Phys II)

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
10K
Top