• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Electric field of a Ring

  • Thread starter tuggler
  • Start date
  • #1
45
0

Homework Statement



I am suppose to find an expression for the electric field of a ring.


Homework Equations



[tex]E =\frac{Kq}{r^2}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated my results and I reached up to this:

[tex]\frac{Kx\Delta q}{(R^2 + x^2)}^{3/2}[/tex] where R = radius, x = distance, K = constant, q = charge.

And then I looked at my book and noticed they integrated with respect to [tex]\Delta q [/tex] which got me confused because [tex]\Delta q [/tex] is not a geometric property. And the final expression the book got was [tex]\frac{Kx q}{(R^2 + x^2)}^{3/2}[/tex].

How come they can integrate with respect to [tex]\Delta q [/tex]?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
34,060
9,935
You can integrate over the total charge in the same way you can integrate over the length of the ring, or over the total mass to calculate the moment of inertia. The integration variable does not have to be a length, it can be nearly everything.
 
  • #3
662
307
Integration is just summation of infinitely small elements of something. Here you are adding up all the Electric field due to all the Δq of the ring at a point along the axis at a distance x. So according to your equation

[itex]\sum \Delta E =\sum \frac{K x\Delta q}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}}[/itex]
becomes,
[itex]\int \ dE =\int \frac{K x dq}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}}[/itex]
when Δq→0
 
  • #4
45
0
But when I was measuring the electric field of a line of charge I got the expression [tex]\sum \frac{d \Delta Q}{(y_1^2 + d^2)^{3/2}}[/tex] but with that expression I cant integrate over [tex]\Delta Q[/tex] because its not a geometric quantity so I had to replace [tex]\Delta Q[/tex] with [tex]\Delta Q = Q/L \Delta y.[/tex] I don't understand why we had to change it with the field of a line but not with a disk?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
34,060
9,935
Integration variables don't have to be geometric quantities.

I don't understand why we had to change it with the field of a line but not with a disk?
You don't have to in both cases.
 
  • #6
45
0
I am not understanding, then why did my book try and trick me?
 
  • #7
45
0
They did those two problems different with the same reasoning I mentioned above. And they did the same thing with an electric field of a disk as they did with the line of charge by replacing [tex]\Delta Q[/tex] with the density over the surface area [tex] 2r\pi dr[/tex].
 
  • #8
34,060
9,935
I am not understanding, then why did my book try and trick me?
I don't think it did.
If there are multiple ways to solve a problem, you have to choose one. There is no "right" or "wrong" choice.
 

Related Threads on Electric field of a Ring

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
16K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
947
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Top