Electric field over a ring

  • Thread starter Aerosion
  • Start date
  • #1
Aerosion
53
0

Homework Statement



Why is it that if you want to find an electric field over a ring, you take the derivative of the E equation (kq/r^2)? Like, here's an example.


"A 0.5 microcoloumb charge is distributed ona ring of radius 3cm. Find the electric field on the xis of the ring at 1cm, 2 cm, 3cm, etc."

Why is it that you have to take the derivative of the electric field equation instead of, like, the integral or something?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
620
You would need to integrate to get the field. What makes you think that phrase implies taking a derivative?
 
  • #3
Aerosion
53
0
Well, taking the derivative was what got me the answer. Let me do the problem for 1 cm

E=kq/r^2, right, and since it's a ring, we'd have to change r into (x^2+r^2)^(1/2) to get the hypotenuse between the radius r of the ring and the distance which we want to find the electrical field.

So derivatating the dquation ke*q/(x^2+r^2)^(1/2) would get me -ke*q*x/(x^2+r^2)^(3/2).

Plugging in the numbers would be (8.99x10^9)(.5mC)(1cm)/(1cm^2+3cm^2)^(3/2), which would ultimately get me the answer (at least the one that I saw in my book).

Of course, I still don't know why I derivatate the equation.
 
  • #4
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
620
dE=k*dq/(r^2+x^2), ok, that's the length of dE vector. But you only want the component perpendicular to the plane of the ring since the horizontal will cancel when integrated. So you need to multiply that by a trig function. What is it? See, no differentiations. What you did above is turn r^2 into (r^2+x^2)^(1/2) (how?????) and then differentiate incorrectly.
 
  • #5
Aerosion
53
0
Hmm...it's a bit unclear without a picture, sorry.

The reason I turned r^2 into (r^2+x^2)^1/2 is because the radius of the circle and the x would make two sides of a triangle. The two lines woudl meet at the center of the circle, and I just drew the hypotenuse joining the two lines at their opposite ends. Hence, the hypotenuse would be (x^2+r^2)^(1/2).

Thus, it was that line that I was using in place of the r. You know...the slope along the radius.
 
  • #6
Aerosion
53
0
http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/Topics/ElectricForce/gifs/Axis-of-Loop00.gif [Broken]

Here's a kind of good picture I found. Mine is like this one, except without the blue part at the end. That's how I was finding my r.

EDIT: This isn't my problem btw...just a pic I found on Google search that looks kind of like my own
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
620
Yes, that's the length of the hypotenuse. But E field is proportional to 1/length^2 - not 1/length.
 
  • #8
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
620
Exactly the right picture. Notice that when you integrate dE that the dE_perp parts cancel, so you only want to integrate dE_x.
 

Suggested for: Electric field over a ring

Replies
3
Views
279
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
381
Replies
6
Views
303
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
452
Replies
68
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
189
Replies
4
Views
461
Replies
34
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
217
Replies
14
Views
368
Top