1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Electric Field problem

  1. Mar 24, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Positive charges are situated at three corners of a rectangle, as shown in the attachment. Find the electric field at the fourth corner.


    the numbers are: bottom left- 3.00 nC bottom right-5.00 nC top right- 6.00 nC
    the length of the rectangle is .6 m and the width is .2 m
    2. Relevant equations

    F=K q1/r^2

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I found all of the forces

    F1= 9*10^9 (3*10^-9/.2^2) = 675 n/C

    F2= 9*10^9(5*10^-9/.63^2) = 113 n/C

    F3= 9*10^9(6*10^-9/.6^2) = 150 n/C

    Then I know you have to combine vectors and get the answer, but that's what I'm having trouble doing.
    Please help!!
    Thanks in advance:bugeye:
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 24, 2007 #2
    Just a quick note, usually E is reserved for the field and F is for the force.
    It is unclear to me as to whether the charges are positive or negative and this will determine the direction of the field. (your calculation seems to imply that they are all positive)
    So once you have the magnitude of the individual components of the field, I would draw them on a vector diagram. Choose a coordinate system and break up each vector into components along each of the coordinate axes. Add like components to get the resultant field in components. Then you may express the final result in a variety of ways- leave it in components, express it as a magnitude and direction, etc.
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2007
  4. Mar 24, 2007 #3

    Mentz114

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    The force between 2 charges is given by

    F = K q1 q2/r^2 and the field from a charge is E = K q / r^2

    See here
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field

    [edited - thanks Robb ]
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2007
  5. Mar 24, 2007 #4
    Careful, you dropped a factor of r in the denominator for the field.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?