- #1

Ene Dene

- 48

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Ene Dene
- Start date

- #1

Ene Dene

- 48

- 0

- #2

lightgrav

Homework Helper

- 1,248

- 30

is the *distance* from the center-of-charge, so

you might as well NOT displace the charge from the origin.

Second, the potential inside a NON-CONDUCTING sphere

that has been given UNIFORM CHARGE DENSITY

is V = kQr/R^2 .

I'm guessing that your book is pretending to not know

that we live in 3-d. With a 3-d situation l = 1 .

If your drawing doesn't have an "l" in it, then

you can't have an "l" in a formula derived about it!

If you want to call "l" the distance from the origin,

then this makes the drawing NOT symmetric,

so you'll never end up with a symmetric formula.

- #3

Ene Dene

- 48

- 0

I was talking about potential in spherical coordinates (I should have said so). If you have a charge on z asix displaced by unit value it will be proportional to:

1/|

Where P is Lagrande polynom.

If you put a sphere around an origin, and charge on north pole of that sphere, than the potential is proportional 1/r^(l+1) outside that sphere, and to r^l inside sphere, where l is a order of multipole. (for exampe, dipole l=2).

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 246

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 394

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 383

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 512

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 352

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 447

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 591

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 388

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 449