Electric Potential of Spheres

In summary, the conversation discusses two problems involving electric potential: one with an uncharged conducting sphere and a point charge, and the other with two concentric conducting spheres. The first problem is successfully solved by treating the potential of the sphere as if it were located at the center, but the individual is still confused about whether this is the correct approach. The second problem is not yet solved, and the individual is unsure of how to set it up correctly. They have attempted different methods, including using Gauss's Law, but have not yet arrived at the correct answer. The individual is seeking clarification on how to approach the second problem correctly.
  • #1
Saketh
261
2
I have two problems that confuse me for similar reasons. The first one:

Find the potential [itex]\varphi[/itex] of an uncharged conducting sphere outside of which a point charge [itex]q[/itex] is located at a distance [itex]l[/itex] from the sphere's center.
The second one:

A system consists of two concentric conducting spheres, with the inside sphere of radius [itex]a[/itex] carrying a positive charge [itex]q_1[/itex]. What charge [itex]q_2[/itex] has to be deposited on the outside sphere of radius [itex]b[/itex] in order to reduce the potential of the inside sphere to zero?​
There's more to the second problem, but this first part confused me enough.

For the first one, I originally went about it by defining the inner sphere's radius as [itex]R[/itex], and then using the law of cosines to find the distance between the point charge and the surface of the sphere as a function of [tex]\theta[/itex]. This, however, ended in failure, with undefined results.

Then I thought, "maybe the potential of the sphere is located at the center of the sphere?" So I wrote down [tex]\varphi_0 = \varphi_q + \varphi_s[/tex]. Since [tex]\varphi_q[/tex] is [tex]\frac{q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 l}[/tex] if the potential is at the center of the sphere, and [tex]\varphi_s[/tex] is [tex]\frac{0}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R}[/tex], the potential of the sphere must be [tex]\frac{q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 l}[/tex]. This is the right answer, but I am still confused - I thought the potential of a sphere should be treated as if it were on the sphere's surface, not as if it were at the center?

For the second one, I still wasn't sure if potential should be treated as surface or center, so I calculated blindly.

If the potentials are at the center, as gave me the correct answer for the first problem, then in order for the potential of the center sphere to become zero the potential of the outside sphere must cancel it out.

[tex]\varphi_a = -\varphi_b[/tex]

After integrating those expressions from their differential parts, I concluded that [tex]\frac{-q_1 a}{b} = q_2[/tex], which is the wrong answer. I then tried it with Gauss's Law, but I still got the wrong answer.

I'm probably messing up because I don't understand electric potential as it applies to spheres.

In summary, I have two main questions:
  1. Did I do the first problem correctly, and, if so, why is it correct?
  2. How am I supposed to set up the second problem?

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I've figured out the first question, so I don't need help with that one, but the second one (with the two spheres) still confuses me.
 
  • #3


I can understand your confusion with these two problems. Electric potential of spheres can be a tricky concept to grasp, but with some explanation, I hope to clear up your confusion.

First, let's discuss the first problem. You are correct in thinking that the potential of a sphere should be treated as if it were on the surface, not at the center. This is because electric potential is a scalar quantity and is defined at a point in space, not at a particular point inside or outside of an object. So, when we talk about the potential of a sphere, we are referring to the potential at any point on its surface.

Now, to solve the first problem, you can use the equation for electric potential due to a point charge, which is \varphi = \frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r}, where r is the distance from the point charge to the point where we want to calculate the potential. In this case, r would be the distance between the point charge and the surface of the sphere. So, the potential at any point on the surface of the sphere would be \varphi = \frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 l}. This is the same answer you got, but with a different approach.

Moving on to the second problem, let's break it down step by step. First, we know that the potential inside the inner sphere is not affected by the charge on the outer sphere. This is because the inner sphere is a conductor, so any charge placed on its surface will distribute itself evenly on the surface, leaving the potential inside unchanged. So, to reduce the potential of the inner sphere to zero, we need to deposit a charge on the outer sphere that will cancel out the potential due to the charge on the inner sphere.

Now, let's consider Gauss's Law, which states that the electric flux through a closed surface is equal to the charge enclosed by that surface divided by the permittivity of free space. In this problem, we can use a Gaussian surface that encloses only the outer sphere. Since we want the potential inside the inner sphere to be zero, we can set the flux equal to zero and solve for the charge on the outer sphere. This will give us the equation:

\frac{q_1}{\epsilon_0} = \frac{q_2}{b}

Solving for q_2, we get q_2 = \frac{q
 

1. What is the electric potential of a sphere?

The electric potential of a sphere is a measure of the electric potential energy per unit charge at a point on the surface of the sphere. It is also known as the electric potential at that point.

2. How is the electric potential of a sphere calculated?

The electric potential of a sphere can be calculated using the formula V = kQ/r, where V is the electric potential, k is the Coulomb's constant, Q is the charge of the sphere, and r is the distance from the center of the sphere.

3. Can the electric potential of a sphere be negative?

Yes, the electric potential of a sphere can be negative. This indicates that the electric potential energy at that point is negative, meaning that the electric field is directed towards the sphere's surface instead of away from it.

4. How does the radius of a sphere affect its electric potential?

The radius of a sphere has a direct effect on its electric potential. As the radius increases, the electric potential decreases, and vice versa. This is because the electric potential is inversely proportional to the distance from the center of the sphere.

5. What is the significance of the electric potential of a sphere in practical applications?

The electric potential of a sphere is important in many practical applications, such as in capacitors and conductors. It also plays a crucial role in understanding the behavior of charged particles in electric fields and can be used to calculate the work done in moving a charge between two points.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
126
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
385
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
636
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
337
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
1K
Back
Top