Electrical Potential Homework: 3 Charges, 2 uC Each, 0.400m Sides

In summary: Correct, and since Q1 = Q1 := Q, we can say thatYou just said this equation was right, now you say it's...Yes, the equation is correct.
  • #1
stylez03
139
0

Homework Statement


Three equal point charges, each with a charge of 2.00 uC, are placed at the corners of an equilateral triangle whose sides have a length of 0.400 m. What is the potential energy of the system? (Take as zero the potential energy of the three charges when they are infinitely far apart.)

Homework Equations



[tex] U_{tot} = \frac {Q^{2}} {4*pi*8.85*10^{-12}} * (\frac {A} {d1} + \frac {B} {d2} + \frac {C} {d3}) [/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex] U_{tot} = \frac {(2.00*10)^{-19}} {4*pi*8.85*10^{-12}} * (\frac {4} {0.400} + \frac {4} {0.400} + \frac {4} {0.400}) [/tex]

The online program says I'm off by an additive constant once again and my work seems right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Think about assembling the charges one by one, bringing them each in from infinitely far away.
 
  • #3
robb_ said:
Think about assembling the charges one by one, bringing them each in from infinitely far away.

When my professor tells us to think about things, usually it involves something going to 0? Are the charges 0 as you bring them closer?
 
  • #4
No. How much work does it take to bring in one charge from infinity if there are no other charges around?
 
  • #5
robb_ said:
No. How much work does it take to bring in one charge from infinity if there are no other charges around?

The work done would be U_a - U_b = -(U_b-U_a) = -ChangeU
 
  • #6
If there are no other charges around, there is no potential which you would have to do work against to bring in the first charge. Now what about the second charge?
 
  • #7
robb_ said:
If there are no other charges around, there is no potential which you would have to do work against to bring in the first charge. Now what about the second charge?

The work done should be the amount of work it takes to bring in the second charge?
 
  • #8
Calculate that work. Now you have two charges in a region. How much energy does it take to bring in the third charge? Then add.
 
  • #9
robb_ said:
Calculate that work. Now you have two charges in a region. How much energy does it take to bring in the third charge? Then add.

Is there an equation for work in this case? I thought my original equation was it?
 
  • #10
Should it not be:

[tex] U_{tot} = 3*( (\frac {1} {4*pi*8.85*10^{12}}) * (\frac {2.00*10^-{19}} {0.400}) )[/tex]I know the amount of work is just the summation of amount of work to move one charge.
 
  • #11
stylez03 said:
Should it not be:

[tex] U_{tot} = 3*( (\frac {1} {4*pi*8.85*10^{12}}) * (\frac {2.00*10^-{19}} {0.400}) )[/tex]


I know the amount of work is just the summation of amount of work to move one charge.
No. As Robb suggested, think about assembling the array of charges. So, let's start with just one charge in free space; there is no external electric field and no other charges, so the work done to place the charge is zero. No consider bringing a second charge from d = [itex]\infty[/itex] to d = 0.4 How much work must you do on this second charge?
 
  • #12
Hootenanny said:
No. As Robb suggested, think about assembling the array of charges. So, let's start with just one charge in free space; there is no external electric field and no other charges, so the work done to place the charge is zero. No consider bringing a second charge from d = [itex]\infty[/itex] to d = 0.4 How much work must you do on this second charge?

Amount of work would be:

[tex] V = \frac {K*Q} {r} [/tex]
 
  • #13
stylez03 said:
Amount of work would be:

[tex] V = \frac {K*Q} {r} [/tex]
Almost, but not quite. Note that electrical potential is not the same as electric potential energy.
 
  • #14
Hootenanny said:
Almost, but not quite. Note that electrical potential is not the same as electric potential energy.

[tex] U = \frac {1} {4*pi*E_{0}} * \frac {Q_{1}*Q_{2}} {r} [/tex]
 
  • #15
stylez03 said:
[tex] U = \frac {1} {4*pi*E_{0}} * \frac {Q_{1}*Q_{2}} {r} [/tex]
Correct, and since Q1 = Q1 := Q, we can say that

[tex]U = k\frac{Q^2}{r}[/tex]

So, now we have two charges in place and have done U joules of work. So how much work must we do on the third charge (Q) to bring it from d = [itex]\infty[/itex] to d = 0.4?
 
  • #16
Hootenanny said:
Correct, and since Q1 = Q1 := Q, we can say that

[tex]U = k\frac{Q^2}{r}[/tex]

So, now we have two charges in place and have done U joules of work. So how much work must we do on the third charge (Q) to bring it from d = [itex]\infty[/itex] to d = 0.4?

[tex]U = k\frac{Q^3}{r}[/tex]
 
  • #17
Careful, your units aren't even correct here.
First, conceptually, will it take more work to bring in the third charge compared to the second, or less work?
 
  • #18
robb_ said:
Careful, your units aren't even correct here.
First, conceptually, will it take more work to bring in the third charge compared to the second, or less work?

You just said this equation was right, now you say it's incorrect.
 
  • #19
Umm, Q*Q is not the same units as Q*Q*Q.
 
  • #20
robb_ said:
Umm, Q*Q is not the same units as Q*Q*Q.

Well I'm lost in what you're saying now.

You said to move 1 charge the potential is:

[tex]U = k\frac{Q^2}{r}[/tex]

After that I have no idea what you're talking about anymore
 
  • #21
[tex]Q^2[/tex]is not equal to [tex]Q^3[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #22
robb_ said:
[tex]Q^2[/tex]is not equal to [tex]q^3[/tex]

sorry for some reason the latex is not editing correctly.

Okay fine, I understand by moving in another charge that it isn't multiplying by another charge, but I'm still not sure how much work it takes to add another? I thought you would just add the work of another charge as we found in the first charge, so it would be 2*U.
 
  • #23
After the first two are in place, the third charge has to be brought into a region of space where there are other charges that produce a potential. In essence, we must move that charge up the potential hill, just as you had to for the second charge.
The first charge we get for "free" since there is no potential (hill) to push the charge up. The second charge takes some work, since the first charge produces a potential (hill). How much- > [tex] V= kQ/r [/tex], which is the potential produced by the first charge so the work is [tex] U = qV [/tex] where q is the charge you are bringing up the potential V. Now the third charge must be brought up a potential produced by the first two charges. So find the new potential, [tex] V_{new} = V1 + V2[/tex]. Then the work for the thrid charge is [tex]U = q Vnew[/tex] where Vnew is the new potential created by the first two charges.
I hope that makes some sense, it is friday and my brain is fried!
 
Last edited:
  • #24
robb_ said:
After the first two are in place, the third charge has to be brought into a region of space where there are other charges that produce a potential. In essence, we must move that charge up the potential hill, just as you had to for the second charge.
The first charge we get for "free" since there is no potential (hill) to push the charge up. The second charge takes some work, since the first charge produces a potential (hill). How much- > [tex] V= kQ/r [/tex], which is the potential produced by the first charge so the work is [tex] U = qV [/tex] where q is the charge you are bringing up the potential V. Now the third charge must be brought up a potential produced by the first two charges. So find the new potential, [tex] V = V1 + V2[/tex]. Then the work for the thrid charge is [tex]U = q Vnew[/tex] where Vnew is the new potential created by the first two charges.
I hopw that makes some sense, it is friday and my brain is fried!

Yes it is friday, and my brain is fried as well. So let me get this right:

First charge required 0 amounts of work because there was no potential "hill" to push up. So the potential energy of the system is currently Zero

Second charge requires work because there is a potential "hill" to be pushed up, since charge 1 has a potential to produce.
Charge 1 produces [tex] V= kQ/r [/tex]

So the amount of work for Charge 2 => [tex] U = qV [/tex]

Third charge requires work too because now there is a potential "hill" from both Charge1 + Charge2 which is [tex] U = qVnew [/tex]

So is [tex] Vnew => V= kQ/r [/tex]

and

[tex] U = q*(kQ/r) [/tex]
 
  • #25
Almost correct, except that Vnew is due to both charges, so you add up the potential from each. V1+V2
 
  • #26
robb_ said:
Almost correct, except that Vnew is due to both charges, so you add up the potential from each. V1+V2

hm, you said the potential to bring in Charge1 = 0

you said the potential to bring in Charge2 = [tex] V= kQ/r [/tex]

so when you bring in Charge 3 is that just the sum of work from charge 1 and 2 which is just [tex] V= kQ/r [/tex] ??
 
  • #27
To bring in the third charge, you must do work against a potential in space that is created by two charges. So the total potential now, Vnew, is a sum of the potentials created by charge 1 and charge 2. Each of which can be solved for by the equation you state. But the total potential is a sum of these individual contributions.
 
  • #28
Notice for charge 2 that the potential is [tex]V = KQ/r[/tex]. There is only one term since only the first charge is producing a potential in that region. Of course the second charge produces a potential as well, but when we calculate the work to bring that one in,we don't consider its own potential. This is akin to the statement that only external forces can accelerate an object.
 
  • #29
robb_ said:
To bring in the third charge, you must do work against a potential in space that is created by two charges. So the total potential now, Vnew, is a sum of the potentials created by charge 1 and charge 2. Each of which can be solved for by the equation you state. But the total potential is a sum of these individual contributions.

Since Charge1/2 produce a potential and we found that to be

[tex] V= kQ/r [/tex]

The sum of potential caused by charge1/2 is just [tex] 2V [/tex]

So then the amount of work that must be generated to bring Charge 3 is

[tex] U = q*(2V) [/tex]
 
  • #30
The potential to consider for the third charge does work out to be twice that of the single charge in this case. That is because the charges have the same size and sign, and the first two charges are equidistant from the third charge. So please don't think that the new potential is always twice the first one.
In general, [tex]Vnew = \Sigma k Q_{i}/r_{i}[/tex]. I know that may look confusing but it just says to add up the potential from each charge to find the total potential. The distances to each charge may be different, the size or sign may differ as well.
 
  • #31
robb_ said:
The potential to consider for the third charge does work out to be twice that of the single charge in this case. That is because the charges have the same size and sign, and the first two charges are equidistant from the third charge. So please don't think that the new potential is always twice the first one.
In general, [tex]Vnew = \Sigma k Q_{i}/r_{i}[/tex]. I know that may look confusing but it just says to add up the potential from each charge to find the total potential. The distances to each charge may be different, the size or sign may differ as well.

Okay the more I understand this, the more I get confused. The charge value of all 3 three charges are the SAME, the signs are all the same, the distance between all three charges are the SAME. I'm sorry maybe it's just not going into my head, but I'm still not getting what you're saying. You said the potential of charge 3 is just the summation of c1/c2, okay I get that. The potential for c2 is [tex] V= kQ/r [/tex], the only change is that we now have another charge being brought in, there is no sign differences, all the values are still the same. So I don't know what you're asking to sum up because if c1/c2 produce the same potential individually, then they should be 2*V when C3 comes in. From what you're saying that's incorrect, I wish there was a solid example in the book but there isn't.
 
  • #32
No, the total potential for charge three is just twice that of the single charge alone in this problem. Sorry if it didnt come out like that.
 
  • #33
robb_ said:
No, the total potential for charge three is just twice that of the single charge alone in this problem. Sorry if it didnt come out like that.

So ... [tex] V= k(2Q)/r [/tex] ??
 
  • #35

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
345
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
64
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
667
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
816
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
869
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top