Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Electromagnet design

  1. Nov 8, 2009 #1
    I was trying to get the numbers to design a 1T solenoidal electromagnet with a core of permeability >1000 (electric steel or Permalloy). I think the permeability saturates at some field strength(0.2T?). But I am not sure how to use the formula after saturation. should I just use u0 instead of u0ur?
    How exactly is the field strength measured? Say for a solenoid and a button type permanent magnet. At what distance from the surface?
    I am using the formula B=u0ur*n*I
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 8, 2009 #2
    Here in thumbnail is the permeability curve for soft iron. 300 amp-turns per meter should push soft iron above 1 Tesla inside a long solenoid. The equation for the field inside a finite length solenoid is given in Smythe "Static and Dynamic Electricity" 3rd edition page 297.

    Bob S
     

    Attached Files:

  4. Nov 10, 2009 #3
    Bobs, thanks. That makes sense. I just need to grab the static and dynamic electricity book.
     
  5. Nov 11, 2009 #4
    Smythe's exact solution for the on-axis B field in a finite-length solenoid is posted in the thumbnail.

    Bob S
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Nov 11, 2009 #5
    Thanks. Any idea how you measure the field of a permanent magnet?
    I bought one of those neodymium magnets. They are supposed to be 1T. But I am not sure how to measure the field.
     
  7. Nov 11, 2009 #6
    I have used three ways. All are difficult.
    1) Integrating coil. Wrap 100-200 turns of #40 wire into a coil with ID the same as the magnet OD. Count # turns. Build an integrating circuit with about 1 minute time constant. R series = 100 k, C feedback= 600 uF. Put a 10 meg bleed resistor in parallel with C. choose a low bias current, low voltage offset op amp.
    2) Use a Hall Effect Sensor. Make good differential amplifier op amp to amplify signal. Calibration accuracy of sensor is only about +/- 20%
    3) Proton resonance NMR. very accurate. Very difficult to set up.
    Bob S.
     
  8. Nov 11, 2009 #7
    Proton NMR seems intriguing.
    I tried (2), my hall effect sensor (from allegro) saturated at 0.4T when the sensor was close to the magnet (~2 inches). I know mag field drops as u go away from the magnet, but I don't know the relationship(1/r^2?).
     
  9. Nov 12, 2009 #8
    I am aware that the Allegro units saturate. I attach an Analog Devices datasheet that may not saturate, IF the offset adjustment allows for extending the linear range. The surface mount package is difficult to mount, however.
    http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/data_sheets/AD22151.pdf
    Proton magnetic resonance is difficult in inhomogeneous fields because it requires very small NMR samples, of the order of 1 mm cubed. You also need a grid-dip equivalent circuit (do you remember grid-dip resonance detecting circuits?) to detect resonance.
    Bob S
    [added] Here is a site that calculates axial field densities for any size cylindrical neodymium magnet.
    http://www.magnetsales.com/Design/Calc_filles/FluxVsDistance-Disc.asp
    Here is another calculator:
    http://www.arnoldmagnetics.com/mtc/calc_gauss_cyl.htm [Broken]
    Here is a third site:
    http://www.dextermag.com/Calculation.aspx?mode=input&id=FieldCalcCylinder [Broken]
    Bob S
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  10. Nov 12, 2009 #9
    The two attached thumbnail drawings outline a voltage integrator circuit for measuring magnetic fields using the Faraday induction law.
    Bob S
     

    Attached Files:

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Electromagnet design
  1. Electromagnetism ! (Replies: 45)

Loading...