Electromagnet strength

  • Thread starter Malverin
  • Start date
  • #1
139
7
Hello,
If we have an electromagnet
370px-Electromagnet_with_gap.svg.png

with some lifting force, for example 10N, and make core area smaller at the ends, to concentrate the magnetic field (without saturating the core)

Magnetic-concentrators-used-in-Minisens.jpg


according to the formula, for magnetic flux

7e9e42656cdd33eb62af4b11645baae4.png


magnetic field density B , will be greater.

For example if we make area, 4 times smaller we will get 4 times greater B

Then electromagnet force will increase too, and become 4 time greater

0d4a229eb6eaca489af15547277399f7.png


So we get more force, without puting in additional energy.
But I have made a magnetic field simulation in FEMM
http://www.femm.info/wiki/HomePage

and there is an increase in B, but much smaller than this according to the formula.
Is there something wrong with the simulation, or my thoughts are wrong...?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_flux

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnet
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
35,723
12,307
and there is an increase in B, but much smaller than this according to the formula.
What do you get as result?

Is your distance between the magnets much smaller than the length scale of the surface, even with the smaller surface?
Is B homogeneous within that surface?
 
  • #3
139
7
What do you get as result?

Is your distance between the magnets much smaller than the length scale of the surface, even with the smaller surface?
Is B homogeneous within that surface?

The result was about 2 times increase in B, with area ratio of 5
Yes, the distance is much smaller than the length scale of the surface.
I have measured the field in the core too (in point near the smaler surface, and in point near the big surface)
Inside the core B change should be according to formula I think (there are minimum or no losses inside), but it is not...
 
  • #4
139
7
Here is a screenshot of Neodymium magnet simulation. Area ratio is 19 , B increase is about 3 times. So this means more then 80 per cent flux loss! How is that possible?
Permeability of air is so much smaller. Where did the flux go?
 

Attachments

  • Konus 9.jpg
    Konus 9.jpg
    99.5 KB · Views: 381
Last edited:
  • #5
35,723
12,307
That lacks the opposing magnet, the return yoke, and it looks too sharp. As you can see at the field lines, most of the field goes through the sides.
 
  • #6
139
7
That lacks the opposing magnet, the return yoke, and it looks too sharp. As you can see at the field lines, most of the field goes through the sides.

The return yoke to close the loop makes things worse...

This has no sense...:confused:
 

Attachments

  • Konus 19.jpg
    Konus 19.jpg
    71.1 KB · Views: 643
  • #7
35,723
12,307
This does not look like your original sketch. And 2 Tesla is a typical saturation strength... are you sure you do not have saturation?
 
  • #8
139
7
This does not look like your original sketch. And 2 Tesla is a typical saturation strength... are you sure you do not have saturation?

Saturation is not the problem. I have used weaker fields and the ratio is the same.
There can be many variants of this setup. The principal is important.
I have tried differen forms and ratios, and increase in B is never equal to this in the formula.
Not even close...
 
Last edited:
  • #9
35,723
12,307
Hmm well, it cannot be exact, but I would have expected that you can get a reasonable amplification. Well okay, you get an amplification...
 

Related Threads on Electromagnet strength

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
25K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
17K
Replies
6
Views
738
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
1K
Top