Electromagnetism problem

  • Thread starter retupmoc
  • Start date
  • #1
50
0
When going over my notes on the lorentz electromagnetic force in my physics 3 electromagnetism class got a bit puzzled by one statement that seems just to be taken for granted. Could anyone help me and tell me why x1i =r1 -y1j on page 5 on http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/~dland/ELMAG305/Elmag305txt1.pdf [Broken] where frame 1 is the stationary frame and 2 the frame moving with velocity v to the right of frame 1

If its just by using pythagorus wouldnt the above quantities (x,y and r) be to the second power. i just cant get my head around this and realise its probably something really straight forward. any help would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Integral
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,201
56
the vector r = xi + yj by definition, see the figure on the previous page.

Using the Pythograean theorem you get the magnetude of r.

[tex] \mid \hat {r} \mid = \sqrt { x^2 + y^2 } [/tex]

You are dealing with the VECTOR r. See the difference?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
50
0
haha yeah i do now and realise how obvious that was, thanks
 
  • #4
50
0
Another quick question, why on page 6 of the slide does vy1k = v x r?
 

Related Threads on Electromagnetism problem

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
304
Replies
1
Views
931
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
53
Views
8K
Top