1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A Electromagnetism skin depth

  1. Jul 24, 2016 #1
    hi, nowadays I try to get involved electromagnetic waves equations, and I came across that $$ \nabla $$ is treated like $$ ik $$ and $$ \frac {\partial } {\partial t} $$ is treated like $$ -iw $$ And if you look at the part painted with orange in my attachment, afterwards you can see that $$ \nabla $$ and $$ \frac {\partial } {\partial t} $$ is equated to the $$ ik $$ and $$ -iw $$ respectively. It is so weird because those operators are equated to a number. How is it possible??? What is the logic of this situation ??? Is there a proof of that situation???
    I am looking forward to your valuable responses. Thanks in advance....

    Attached Files:

    • XXX.pdf
      File size:
      119 KB
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 24, 2016 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    You should relabel your question as category B. I guess, it is also good advice to learn vector calculus first. A very good short summary can be found in many textbooks in electrodynamics, as in the textbooks by Abraham and Becker, Schwartz, or Griffiths.

    In Cartesian coordinates the nabla symbol represents the differential operator
    $$\vec{\nabla}=\vec{e}_x \partial_x + \vec{e}_y \partial_y + \vec{e}_z \partial_z=\sum_{j=1}^3 \vec{e}_j \partial_j.$$
    For a plane-wave ansatz of an arbitrary field
    $$\phi(t,\vec{x})=\phi_0 \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t+\mathrm{i} \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}),$$
    you have, e.g.,
    $$\partial_x \phi=\mathrm{i} k_x \phi_0 \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t+\mathrm{i} \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x})=\mathrm{i} k_x \phi(t,\vec{x}),$$
    $$\vec{\nabla} \phi=\mathrm{i} \vec{k} \phi.$$
    Thus for such fields you can indeed set ##\vec{\nabla} \rightarrow \mathrm{i} \vec{k}##.

    The time derivative in the same sense is obviously equivalent to the substitution ##\partial_t=-\mathrm{i} \omega##.

    This underlines the merit of the Fourier decomposition of fields: The vector operators in time-position representation become algebraic relations with ##\omega## and ##\vec{k}## (i.e., in frequency-wavevector space), i.e., the field equations become algebraic equations, and often you can solve problems by transforming the solutions of these algebraic equations back to time-position space.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Threads - Electromagnetism skin depth Date
B Electromagnetic Units Mar 11, 2018
I How an electric field is absorbed by a dielectric Feb 5, 2018
I Electromagnetics wireless transmission of Energy Jan 16, 2018
I Emitted radiation Nov 30, 2017
Electric/Magnetic vicious cycle Mar 22, 2015