- #1

- 51

- 0

Thanks.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter jimmy42
- Start date

- #1

- 51

- 0

Thanks.

- #2

SammyS

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 11,365

- 1,032

That's not quite correct: Let's rewrite it.

Thanks.

"If an electron is acted upon by a magnetic [STRIKE]force[/STRIKE]

The answer to the question is YES.Now if I add an electric force so that the electron carries on in the x direction. Will that electric force need to act in the negative y direction with the same magnitude as the magnetic force?

- #3

- 51

- 0

OK thanks. How can I use the Lorentz force law to prove that?

I have done this:

[tex]E = F - (V x B )/ q[/tex]

Not sure how that equation can tell be the direction. Any help?

- #4

gneill

Mentor

- 20,925

- 2,866

The Lorentz force:

[tex] \vec{F} = q\left[ \vec{E} + \left( \vec{v} \times \vec{B}\right) \right] [/tex]

Everything in the equation is a vector except for the charge, q (which does have a sign though). The "x" is the cross product. The directions of things are determined by the rules of vector manipulation.

In your case you want the net force to be zero, so you can rearrange to solve for E, as you've done. Now, when each of the vectors involved have only a single non-zero component, the expansion of the vector expression into separate component expressions becomes relatively easy (if you want to solve the problem "mechanically"). Otherwise, a little intuition about the directions that the fields must go in order to provide the required force directions on the moving, charged particle will suffice.

Share:

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 3K